Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] sched/numa: Enhance vma scanning logic

[Raghavendra K T]

On 2/27/2023 3:36 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 12:10:41PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> > In summary: I do see that access to VMAs from disjoint sets is not fully
> >   fair, But on the other hand it is not very bad too. There is definitely
> > some scope or possibility to explore/improve fairness in this area
> > further.
>
> Ok, might be good to summarize some of this in a comment near here, so
> that readers are aware of the caveat of this code.

Sure will do.

> > PS: I have also tested above applying V3 patch (which incorporates your
> > suggestions), have not seen much deviation in observation with patch.
>
> I'll see if I can find it in this dumpester fire I call inbox :-)

Sorry I wasn't clear there.. Still in inbox and am about to post.. It
was a heads up.