Re: [PATCH 0/3] OPP: Simplify set_required_opp handling

[Viresh Kumar]

On 27-02-23, 17:21, Jun Nie wrote:
> Sorry for not expressing it accurately. I should say devfreq devices
> pointers, just
> devfreq_virt_devs vs genpd_virt_devs. Then you know why I add devfreq-devs
> dts nodes below.

Won't something like dev_pm_opp_set_clkname() would be enough here too ? We
already do this kind of work for clks and regulators.

Having power domain specific information within CPU nodes isn't a requirement of
the OPP core, but the general requirement of genpd core instead.

-- 
viresh