On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 10:47:02AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 01:51:14PM -0700, Yury Norov wrote:
Test newly added bitmap_{from,to}_arr64() functions similarly to
already existing bitmap_{from,to}_arr32() tests.
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@xxxxxxxxx>
Ever since this test is in the tree, several of my boot tests show
lots of messages such as
test_bitmap: bitmap_to_arr64(nbits == 1): tail is not safely cleared: 0xa5a5a5a500000001 (must be 0x0000000000000001)
test_bitmap: bitmap_to_arr64(nbits == 2): tail is not safely cleared: 0xa5a5a5a500000001 (must be 0x0000000000000003)
test_bitmap: bitmap_to_arr64(nbits == 3): tail is not safely cleared: 0xa5a5a5a500000001 (must be 0x0000000000000007)
...
test_bitmap: bitmap_to_arr64(nbits == 927): tail is not safely cleared: 0xa5a5a5a500000000 (must be 0x000000007fffffff)
test_bitmap: bitmap_to_arr64(nbits == 928): tail is not safely cleared: 0xa5a5a5a580000000 (must be 0x00000000ffffffff)
This may be a real problem. Can you share what's the system is? What's
endianness and register length?
+ Alexander Lobakin, the author of the exact subtest.
but then:
test_bitmap: all 6550 tests passed
It's because corresponding error path doesn't increment failed_tests
counter. I'll send a fix shortly.
The message suggests an error, given that it is displayed with pr_err,
but the summary suggests otherwise.
Is the message just noise, or is there a problem ?
Thanks,
Guenter
---
lib/test_bitmap.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/test_bitmap.c b/lib/test_bitmap.c
index 0c82f07f74fc..d5923a640457 100644
--- a/lib/test_bitmap.c
+++ b/lib/test_bitmap.c
@@ -585,6 +585,30 @@ static void __init test_bitmap_arr32(void)
}
}
+static void __init test_bitmap_arr64(void)
+{
+ unsigned int nbits, next_bit;
+ u64 arr[EXP1_IN_BITS / 64];
+ DECLARE_BITMAP(bmap2, EXP1_IN_BITS);
+
+ memset(arr, 0xa5, sizeof(arr));
+
+ for (nbits = 0; nbits < EXP1_IN_BITS; ++nbits) {
+ memset(bmap2, 0xff, sizeof(arr));
+ bitmap_to_arr64(arr, exp1, nbits);
+ bitmap_from_arr64(bmap2, arr, nbits);
+ expect_eq_bitmap(bmap2, exp1, nbits);
+
+ next_bit = find_next_bit(bmap2, round_up(nbits, BITS_PER_LONG), nbits);
+ if (next_bit < round_up(nbits, BITS_PER_LONG))
+ pr_err("bitmap_copy_arr64(nbits == %d:"
+ " tail is not safely cleared: %d\n", nbits, next_bit);
+
+ if (nbits < EXP1_IN_BITS - 64)
+ expect_eq_uint(arr[DIV_ROUND_UP(nbits, 64)], 0xa5a5a5a5);
+ }
+}
+
static void noinline __init test_mem_optimisations(void)
{
DECLARE_BITMAP(bmap1, 1024);
@@ -852,6 +876,7 @@ static void __init selftest(void)
test_copy();
test_replace();
test_bitmap_arr32();
+ test_bitmap_arr64();
test_bitmap_parse();
test_bitmap_parselist();
test_bitmap_printlist();
--
2.32.0