[PATCH net] net/sched: cls_api: Move call to tcf_exts_miss_cookie_base_destroy()

[Nathan Chancellor]

When CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT is disabled:

  ../net/sched/cls_api.c:141:13: warning: 'tcf_exts_miss_cookie_base_destroy' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
    141 | static void tcf_exts_miss_cookie_base_destroy(struct tcf_exts *exts)
        |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Due to the way the code is structured, it is possible for a definition
of tcf_exts_miss_cookie_base_destroy() to be present without actually
being used. Its single callsite is in an '#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT'
block but a definition will always be present in the file. The version
of tcf_exts_miss_cookie_base_destroy() that actually does something
depends on CONFIG_NET_TC_SKB_EXT, so the stub function is used in both
CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT=n and CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT=y + CONFIG_NET_TC_SKB_EXT=n
configurations.

Move the call to tcf_exts_miss_cookie_base_destroy() in
tcf_exts_destroy() out of the '#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT', so that it
always appears used to the compiler, while not changing any behavior
with any of the various configuration combinations.

Fixes: 80cd22c35c90 ("net/sched: cls_api: Support hardware miss to tc action")
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 net/sched/cls_api.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/sched/cls_api.c b/net/sched/cls_api.c
index 3569e2c3660c..2a6b6be0811b 100644
--- a/net/sched/cls_api.c
+++ b/net/sched/cls_api.c
@@ -3241,9 +3241,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcf_exts_init_ex);
 
 void tcf_exts_destroy(struct tcf_exts *exts)
 {
-#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
 	tcf_exts_miss_cookie_base_destroy(exts);
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
 	if (exts->actions) {
 		tcf_action_destroy(exts->actions, TCA_ACT_UNBIND);
 		kfree(exts->actions);

---
base-commit: ac3ad19584b26fae9ac86e4faebe790becc74491
change-id: 20230224-cls_api-wunused-function-17aa94fdef90

Best regards,
-- 
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx>