Re: [PATCH] arm: Drop CONFIG_MTD_M25P80 in various defconfig files

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 23/02/2023 12:00, Bin Meng wrote:
> On 2023/2/23 18:50:36, "Krzysztof Kozlowski" 
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> On 23/02/2023 11:46, Bin Meng wrote:
>>>  On 2023/2/10 17:32:24, "Bin Meng" <bmeng@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  Drop CONFIG_MTD_M25P80 that was removed in
>>>>  commit b35b9a10362d ("mtd: spi-nor: Move m25p80 code in spi-nor.c")
>>>>
>>>>  Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>>  ---
>>>>
>>>>   arch/arm/configs/axm55xx_defconfig     | 2 +-
>>>>   arch/arm/configs/davinci_all_defconfig | 1 -
>>>>   arch/arm/configs/dove_defconfig        | 1 -
>>>>   arch/arm/configs/keystone_defconfig    | 1 -
>>>>   arch/arm/configs/mvebu_v5_defconfig    | 1 -
>>>>   arch/arm/configs/mxs_defconfig         | 1 -
>>>>   arch/arm/configs/pxa_defconfig         | 1 -
>>>>   arch/arm/configs/qcom_defconfig        | 1 -
>>>>   arch/arm/configs/socfpga_defconfig     | 1 -
>>>>   9 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>  Ping?
>>
>> No need for pinging, but you need to send to soc folks. Otherwise no one
>> will pick it up. You will get the address from get_maintainer.pl -f
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile (yes, it is quite hidden on purpose).
> 
> Yeah I used the script to generate the cc list.

Did you read my message fully? Because the CC list is not having the
proper address, thus maybe you based your patch on some old kernel.
Please rebase.

> 
> Let me know if I need to split this patch into several ones (per-soc a 
> patch) so that each soc maintainer only picks up their own?

If you did what I wrote about and the kernel is fairly recent, then no
need...


Best regards,
Krzysztof