Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] mfd: max77541: Add ADI MAX77541/MAX77540 PMIC Support

[Lee Jones]

On Tue, 21 Feb 2023, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 01:39:13PM +0300, Okan Sahin wrote:
> > MFD driver for MAX77541/MAX77540 to enable its sub
> > devices.
> > 
> > The MAX77541 is a multi-function devices. It includes
> > buck converter and ADC.
> > 
> > The MAX77540 is a high-efficiency buck converter
> > with two 3A switching phases.
> > 
> > They have same regmap except for ADC part of MAX77541.
> 
> Extra space in the Subject.
> 
> ...
> 
> > +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> 
> Why?
> 
> ...
> 
> > +static const struct regmap_config max77541_regmap_config = {
> > +	.reg_bits   = 8,
> > +	.val_bits   = 8,
> 
> Do you need lock of regmap?
> 
> > +};
> 
> ...
> 
> > +static const struct mfd_cell max77540_devs[] = {
> 
> > +	MFD_CELL_OF("max77540-regulator", NULL, NULL, 0, 0,
> > +		    NULL),
> 
> Perfectly one line.
> 
> > +};
> 
> > +static const struct mfd_cell max77541_devs[] = {
> > +	MFD_CELL_OF("max77541-regulator", NULL, NULL, 0, 0,
> > +		    NULL),
> > +	MFD_CELL_OF("max77541-adc", NULL, NULL, 0, 0,
> > +		    NULL),
> 
> Ditto.
> 
> > +};
> 
> ...
> 
> > +	if (max77541->chip->id == MAX77541) {
> > +		ret = devm_regmap_add_irq_chip(dev, max77541->regmap, irq,
> > +					       IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_SHARED, 0,
> > +					       &max77541_adc_irq_chip,
> > +					       &max77541->irq_adc);
> > +		if (ret)
> > +			return ret;
> > +	}
> 
> > +	return ret;
> 
> return 0;
> 
> ...
> 
> > +static const struct i2c_device_id max77541_i2c_id[];
> 
> What for?
> 
> ...
> 
> > +	if (dev->of_node)
> > +		max77541->chip  = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> > +	else
> > +		max77541->chip  = (struct chip_info *)
> > +					i2c_match_id(max77541_i2c_id,
> > +						     client)->driver_data;
> 
> Oh. Please use
> 
> 	const struct i2c_device_id *id = i2c_client_get_device_id(client);
> 	...
> 	max77541->chip  = device_get_match_data(dev); // needs property.h
> 	if (!max77541->chip)
> 		max77541->chip  = (struct chip_info *)id->driver_data;
> 
> > +	if (!max77541->chip)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> 
> ...
> 
> > +#ifndef __MAX77541_MFD_H__
> > +#define __MAX77541_MFD_H__
> 
> Can we go towards consistency in this?
> Seems to me the most used patter so far is
> 
> #ifndef __LINUX_MFD_MAX77541_H

Drop the LINUX_ part please.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]