Re: [PATCH 1/5] MAINTAINERS: Add scripts/pahole-flags.sh to BPF section

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 11:21:39AM +0000, maennich@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Currently, scripts/pahole-flags.sh has no formal maintainer. Add it to
> the BPF section so that patches to it can be properly reviewed and
> picked up.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220201205624.652313-2-nathan@xxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Maennich <maennich@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  MAINTAINERS | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 4f50a453e18a..176485e625a0 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -3407,6 +3407,7 @@ F:	net/sched/act_bpf.c
>  F:	net/sched/cls_bpf.c
>  F:	samples/bpf/
>  F:	scripts/bpf_doc.py
> +F:	scripts/pahole-flags.sh
>  F:	tools/bpf/
>  F:	tools/lib/bpf/
>  F:	tools/testing/selftests/bpf/
> -- 
> 2.39.2.637.g21b0678d19-goog
> 

No need for MAINTAINERS updates for older kernels as no one should be
making new patches against them, right?

thanks,

greg k-h