Re: [PATCH v4 09/16] s390: mm: Convert to GENERIC_IOREMAP

[Baoquan He]

On 02/16/23 at 05:21pm, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-02-16 at 20:34 +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > By taking GENERIC_IOREMAP method, the generic generic_ioremap_prot(),
> > generic_iounmap(), and their generic wrapper ioremap_prot(), ioremap()
> > and iounmap() are all visible and available to arch. Arch needs to
> > provide wrapper functions to override the generic versions if there's
> > arch specific handling in its ioremap_prot(), ioremap() or iounmap().
> > This change will simplify implementation by removing duplicated codes
> > with generic_ioremap_prot() and generic_iounmap(), and has the equivalent
> > functioality as before.
> > 
> > Here, add wrapper functions ioremap_prot() and iounmap() for s390's
> > special operation when ioremap() and iounmap().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Sven Schnelle <svens@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > ---
> >  arch/s390/Kconfig          |  1 +
> >  arch/s390/include/asm/io.h | 21 ++++++++------
> >  arch/s390/pci/pci.c        | 57 +++++++-------------------------------
> >  3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
> 
> Thanks for the patch. This is a very clear improvement for us! I tested
> this series with s390 systems with and without the PCI memory-I/O (MIO)
> support and everything works as expected.
> 
> One thing I did stumble upon but which is independent from this patch
> is that I think memremap(…, MEMREMAP_WB) on system RAM outside the
> direct map is broken for us. At least on systems without PCI memory-I/O
> support. I think with this series it would be much easier to fix
> though. Basically I think we would have to define arch_memremap_wb() to
> generic_ioremap_prot(…, PAGE_KERNEL) and then have iounmap() check
> is_ioremap_addr() to see if it is an actual mapping or an address
> cookie. But again this is independent of this patch which doesn't
> change the behavior in this area.

OK, I can check this after this patchset done.

> 
> So feel free to add my:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks a lot, will add these when repost.