[PATCH 3/7] ext4: call ext4_bg_num_gdb_[no]meta directly in ext4_num_base_meta_clusters

From: Kemeng Shi
Date: Mon Feb 20 2023 - 22:57:52 EST


ext4_num_base_meta_clusters is already aware of meta_bg feature and test
if block_group is inside real meta block groups before calling
ext4_bg_num_gdb. Then ext4_bg_num_gdb will check if block group is inside
a real meta block groups again to decide either ext4_bg_num_gdb_meta or
ext4_bg_num_gdb_nometa is needed.
Call ext4_bg_num_gdb_meta or ext4_bg_num_gdb_nometa directly after we
check if block_group is inside a meta block groups in
ext4_num_base_meta_clusters to remove redundant check of meta block
groups in ext4_bg_num_gdb.

Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/ext4/balloc.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/balloc.c b/fs/ext4/balloc.c
index 22be5cd70505..9b8a32b90ddc 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/balloc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/balloc.c
@@ -889,11 +889,11 @@ static unsigned ext4_num_base_meta_clusters(struct super_block *sb,
block_group < le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_first_meta_bg) *
sbi->s_desc_per_block) {
if (num) {
- num += ext4_bg_num_gdb(sb, block_group);
+ num += ext4_bg_num_gdb_nometa(sb, block_group);
num += le16_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_reserved_gdt_blocks);
}
} else { /* For META_BG_BLOCK_GROUPS */
- num += ext4_bg_num_gdb(sb, block_group);
+ num += ext4_bg_num_gdb_meta(sb, block_group);
}
return EXT4_NUM_B2C(sbi, num);
}
--
2.30.0