Re: [PATCH V2 18/21] RISC-V: Add ACPI initialization in setup_arch()

From: Andrew Jones
Date: Mon Feb 20 2023 - 15:07:54 EST


On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 11:50:40PM +0530, Sunil V L wrote:
> Initialize the ACPI core for RISC-V during boot.
>
> ACPI tables and interpreter are initialized based on
> the information passed from the firmware and the value of
> the kernel parameter 'acpi'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c | 113 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c | 25 ++++++---
> 2 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c
> index 13b26c87c136..35e7b24a30c8 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> #include <linux/acpi.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> #include <linux/pci.h>
> +#include <linux/efi.h>
>
> int acpi_noirq = 1; /* skip ACPI IRQ initialization */
> int acpi_disabled = 1;
> @@ -26,6 +27,118 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_pci_disabled);
>
> static unsigned int intc_count;
> static struct acpi_madt_rintc cpu_madt_rintc[NR_CPUS];
> +static bool param_acpi_off __initdata;
> +static bool param_acpi_on __initdata;
> +static bool param_acpi_force __initdata;
> +
> +static int __init parse_acpi(char *arg)
> +{
> + if (!arg)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /* "acpi=off" disables both ACPI table parsing and interpreter */
> + if (strcmp(arg, "off") == 0)
> + param_acpi_off = true;
> + else if (strcmp(arg, "on") == 0) /* prefer ACPI over DT */
> + param_acpi_on = true;
> + else if (strcmp(arg, "force") == 0) /* force ACPI to be enabled */
> + param_acpi_force = true;
> + else
> + return -EINVAL; /* Core will print when we return error */
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +early_param("acpi", parse_acpi);
> +
> +/*
> + * acpi_fadt_sanity_check() - Check FADT presence and carry out sanity
> + * checks on it
> + *
> + * Return 0 on success, <0 on failure
> + */
> +static int __init acpi_fadt_sanity_check(void)
> +{
> + struct acpi_table_header *table;
> + struct acpi_table_fadt *fadt;
> + acpi_status status;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * FADT is required on riscv; retrieve it to check its presence
> + * and carry out revision and ACPI HW reduced compliancy tests
> + */
> + status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_FADT, 0, &table);
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> + const char *msg = acpi_format_exception(status);
> +
> + pr_err("Failed to get FADT table, %s\n", msg);
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + fadt = (struct acpi_table_fadt *)table;
> +
> + if (!(fadt->flags & ACPI_FADT_HW_REDUCED)) {

Do we also need to check for ACPI version 5.0+ when checking for HW
reduced?

> + pr_err("FADT not ACPI hardware reduced compliant\n");
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * acpi_get_table() creates FADT table mapping that
> + * should be released after parsing and before resuming boot
> + */
> + acpi_put_table(table);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * acpi_boot_table_init() called from setup_arch(), always.
> + * 1. find RSDP and get its address, and then find XSDT
> + * 2. extract all tables and checksums them all
> + * 3. check ACPI FADT HW reduced flag
> + *
> + * We can parse ACPI boot-time tables such as MADT after
> + * this function is called.
> + *
> + * On return ACPI is enabled if either:
> + *
> + * - ACPI tables are initialized and sanity checks passed
> + * - acpi=force was passed in the command line and ACPI was not disabled
> + * explicitly through acpi=off command line parameter
> + *
> + * ACPI is disabled on function return otherwise
> + */
> +void __init acpi_boot_table_init(void)
> +{
> + /*
> + * Enable ACPI instead of device tree unless
> + * - ACPI has been disabled explicitly (acpi=off), or
> + * - firmware has not populated ACPI ptr in EFI system table
> + * and ACPI has not been [force] enabled (acpi=on|force)
> + */
> + if (param_acpi_off ||
> + (!param_acpi_on && !param_acpi_force &&
> + efi.acpi20 == EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR))
> + return;
> +
> + /*
> + * ACPI is disabled at this point. Enable it in order to parse
> + * the ACPI tables and carry out sanity checks
> + */
> + enable_acpi();
> +
> + /*
> + * If ACPI tables are initialized and FADT sanity checks passed,
> + * leave ACPI enabled and carry on booting; otherwise disable ACPI
> + * on initialization error.
> + * If acpi=force was passed on the command line it forces ACPI
> + * to be enabled even if its initialization failed.
> + */
> + if (acpi_table_init() || acpi_fadt_sanity_check()) {
> + pr_err("Failed to init ACPI tables\n");
> + if (!param_acpi_force)
> + disable_acpi();
> + }
> +}

A lot of the above code is common with arm64. It'd be nice to share that,
but maybe refactoring can be done on top of this.

>
> static int acpi_parse_madt_rintc(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, const unsigned long end)
> {
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> index 4335f08ffaf2..c2ee7f4427a1 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
> * Nick Kossifidis <mick@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> */
>
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/mm.h>
> #include <linux/memblock.h>
> @@ -276,14 +277,22 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
>
> efi_init();
> paging_init();
> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BUILTIN_DTB)
> - unflatten_and_copy_device_tree();
> -#else
> - if (early_init_dt_verify(__va(XIP_FIXUP(dtb_early_pa))))
> - unflatten_device_tree();
> - else
> - pr_err("No DTB found in kernel mappings\n");
> -#endif
> +
> + /* Parse the ACPI tables for possible boot-time configuration */
> + acpi_boot_table_init();
> + if (acpi_disabled) {
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BUILTIN_DTB)) {
> + unflatten_and_copy_device_tree();
> + } else {
> + if (early_init_dt_verify(__va(XIP_FIXUP(dtb_early_pa))))
> + unflatten_device_tree();
> + else
> + pr_err("No DTB found in kernel mappings\n");
> + }
> + } else {
> + early_init_dt_verify(__va(XIP_FIXUP(dtb_early_pa)));
> + }
> +
> early_init_fdt_scan_reserved_mem();
> misc_mem_init();
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>

Otherwise,

Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>