Re: [PATCH net-next v1 3/4] net: phy: do not force EEE support

From: Russell King (Oracle)
Date: Mon Feb 20 2023 - 09:18:52 EST


Hi,

A couple of minor points, but not sufficient not to prevent merging
this.

On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 02:56:04PM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> @@ -865,7 +864,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(genphy_c45_read_eee_abilities);
> */
> int genphy_c45_an_config_eee_aneg(struct phy_device *phydev)
> {
> - return genphy_c45_write_eee_adv(phydev, phydev->supported_eee);
> + __ETHTOOL_DECLARE_LINK_MODE_MASK(adv) = {};

It would be nice to avoid this initialisation in the case where
eee_enabled is true, as this takes CPU cycles. However, not too
bothered about it as this isn't a fast path.

> +
> + if (!phydev->eee_enabled)
> + return genphy_c45_write_eee_adv(phydev, adv);
> +
> + return genphy_c45_write_eee_adv(phydev, phydev->advertising_eee);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -1431,17 +1435,17 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(genphy_c45_ethtool_get_eee);
> int genphy_c45_ethtool_set_eee(struct phy_device *phydev,
> struct ethtool_eee *data)
> {
> - __ETHTOOL_DECLARE_LINK_MODE_MASK(adv) = {};
> int ret;
>
> if (data->eee_enabled) {
> + phydev->eee_enabled = true;
> if (data->advertised)
> - adv[0] = data->advertised;
> - else
> - linkmode_copy(adv, phydev->supported_eee);
> + phydev->advertising_eee[0] = data->advertised;

Is there a reason not to use ethtool_convert_legacy_u32_to_link_mode()?
I'm guessing this will be more efficient.

Other than that, looks good.

Reviewed-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks!

--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!