Re: [regression] Bug 217037 - cmb attributes missing from the nvme class under sysfs

[Michal Berger]

Have there been any patches submitted for testing? I don't see any as
part of this thread nor at the bugzilla where the issue was initially
reported. :)

Regards,
Michal


pt., 17 lut 2023 o 22:23 Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> napisał(a):
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 8:19 AM Keith Busch <kbusch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 10:28:55AM +0100, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
> > > Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker.
> > >
> > > I noticed a regression report in bugzilla.kernel.org. As many (most?)
> > > kernel developer don't keep an eye on it, I decided to forward it by
> > > mail. Quoting from https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217037 :
> > >
> > > >  michallinuxstuff@xxxxxxxxx 2023-02-14 14:16:26 UTC
> > > >
> > > > For the CMB-capable nvme ctrls, kernel was exposing couple of related attributes under the sysfs. E.g.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > # grep . /sys/class/nvme/nvme0/cmb*
> > > > /sys/class/nvme/nvme0/cmb:cmbloc : x00000062
> > > > /sys/class/nvme/nvme0/cmb:cmbsz  : x0008021d
> > > > /sys/class/nvme/nvme0/cmbloc:98
> > > > /sys/class/nvme/nvme0/cmbsz:524829
> >
> > The breakage is that the attributes are decided before we've setup the cmb
> > regions. I'll send a fix shortly.
>
> Michael, have you tested this? It's queued up for inclusion, but I don't
> see any evidence that this was tested.
>
> --
> Jens Axboe
>