Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] dt-bindings: Add RISC-V misaligned access performance

From: Evan Green
Date: Wed Feb 15 2023 - 16:00:44 EST


On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 1:26 PM Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 12:14:53PM -0800, Evan Green wrote:
> > From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > This key allows device trees to specify the performance of misaligned
> > accesses to main memory regions from each CPU in the system.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Evan Green <evan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > (no changes since v1)
> >
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml | 15 +++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml
> > index c6720764e765..2c09bd6f2927 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml
> > @@ -85,6 +85,21 @@ properties:
> > $ref: "/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string"
> > pattern: ^rv(?:64|32)imaf?d?q?c?b?v?k?h?(?:_[hsxz](?:[a-z])+)*$
> >
> > + riscv,misaligned-access-performance:
> > + description:
> > + Identifies the performance of misaligned memory accesses to main memory
> > + regions. There are three flavors of unaligned access performance: "emulated"
>
> Is the performance: emulated the source of the dt_binding_check issues?
> And the fix is as simple as:
> - description:
> + description: |
> ?

Yep, I can pass cleanly with that change. Thanks!