Re: [PATCH v2] fixed typos on selftests/bpf

From: Martin KaFai Lau
Date: Wed Feb 15 2023 - 13:22:09 EST


On 2/14/23 7:21 PM, Taichi Nishimura wrote:
Hi Randy,

Thank you for your reviewing.
I fixed costant and it's to constant and its, respectively.

Best regards,
Taichi Nishimura

Signed-off-by: Taichi Nishimura <awkrail01@xxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_cls_redirect.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_cls_redirect.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_cls_redirect.c
index a8ba39848bbf..66b304982245 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_cls_redirect.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_cls_redirect.c
@@ -610,8 +610,8 @@ static INLINING ret_t get_next_hop(buf_t *pkt, encap_headers_t *encap,
*
* fill_tuple(&t, foo, sizeof(struct iphdr), 123, 321)
*
- * clang will substitute a costant for sizeof, which allows the verifier
- * to track it's value. Based on this, it can figure out the constant
+ * clang will substitute a constant for sizeof, which allows the verifier
+ * to track its value. Based on this, it can figure out the constant

This does not apply. Ensure the diff is generated by git, and against the bpf-next tree. Please include everything in v1 also, resubmit and tag for bpf-next in the subject.