Re: [PATCH] Revert "venus: firmware: Correct non-pix start and end addresses"

[Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)]

On 15.02.23 11:57, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 11:53 AM Linux regression tracking (Thorsten
> Leemhuis) <regressions@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 11.02.23 15:27, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
>>> On 10.02.23 11:07, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>>> On 2/10/23 10:22, Vikash Garodia wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> So what should we do about this folks? Since not allowing the driver to probe on
>>>>>> at least SC7180 is a quite serious regression, can we revert for now until a proper
>>>>>> fix is figured out?
>>>>> I am able to repro this issue on sc7180 and discussing with firmware team on the cause
>>>>> of reset failure. The original patch was raised for fixing rare SMMU faults during warm
>>>>> boot of video hardware. Hence looking to understand the regressing part before we
>>>>> proceed to revert.
>>>> Great, if you are working on a proper fix then that would be much better indeed.
>>> Yeah, that's great, but OTOH: there is almost certainly just one week
>>> before 6.2 will be released. Ideally this should be fixed by then.
>>> Vikash, do you think that's in the cards? If not: why not revert this
>>> now to make sure 6.2 works fine?
>> Hmm, no reply. And we meanwhile have Wednesday and 6.2 is almost
>> certainly going to be out on Sunday. And the problem was called "a quite
>> serious regression" above. So why not quickly fix this with the revert,
>> as proposed earlier?
>> Vikash? Javier?
>
> I agree with you, that we should land this revert and then properly
> fix the page fault issue in v6.3.
> 
> But it's not my call, the v4l2/media folks have to decide that.

In that case: Mauro, what's your opinion here?

Thread starts here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230207102254.1446461-1-javierm@xxxxxxxxxx/

Regression report:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Y9LSMap%2BjRxbtpC8@xxxxxxxxxx/

Ciao, Thorsten