Re: [PATCH 1/4] iommu: Add dev_iommu->ops_rwsem
From: Robin Murphy
Date: Wed Feb 15 2023 - 06:24:49 EST
On 2023-02-15 05:34, Baolu Lu wrote:
On 2/13/23 10:16 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 03:49:38PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
+static int iommu_group_freeze_dev_ops(struct iommu_group *group)
+{
+ struct group_device *device;
+ struct device *dev;
+
+ mutex_lock(&group->mutex);
+ list_for_each_entry(device, &group->devices, list) {
+ dev = device->dev;
+ down_read(&dev->iommu->ops_rwsem);
This isn't allowed, you can't obtain locks in a loop like this, it
will deadlock.
You don't need more locks, we already have the group mutex, the
release path should be fixed to use it properly as I was trying to do
here:
https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/4-v1-ef00ffecea52+2cb-iommu_group_lifetime_jgg@xxxxxxxxxx/
https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/YyyTxx0HnA3maxEk@xxxxxxxxxx/
Then what you'd do in a path like this is:
mutex_lock(&group->mutex);
dev = iommu_group_first_device(group)
if (!dev)
/* Racing with group cleanup */
return -EINVAL;
/* Now dev->ops is valid and must remain valid so long as
group->mutex is held */
The only reason this doesn't work already is because of the above
stuff about release not holding the group mutex when manipulating the
devices in the group. This is simply mis-locked.
Robin explained it was done like this because
arm_iommu_detach_device() re-enters the iommu core during release_dev,
so I suggest fixing that by simply not doing that (see above)
Below is the lastest attempt I had tried, I didn't have time to get back
to it and we fixed the bug another way. It needs a bit of adjusting to
also remove the device from the group after release is called within
the same mutex critical region.
Yes. If we can make remove device from list and device release in the
same mutex critical region, we don't need any other lock mechanism
anymore.
The ipmmu driver supports default domain.
It supports default domains *on arm64*. Nothing on 32-bit ARM uses
default domains, they won't even exist since iommu-dma is not enabled,
and either way the ARM DMA ops don't understand groups. I don't see an
obvious satisfactory solution while the arm_iommu_* APIs still exist,
but if we need bodges in the interim could we please try to concentrate
them in ARM-specific code?
Thanks,
Robin.
When code comes to release
device, the device driver has already been unbound. The default domain
should have been attached to the device. Then iommu_detach_device() does
nothing because what it really does is just attaching default domain.
How about removing iommu_detach_device() from ipmmu's release path like
below?
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c b/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c
index bdf1a4e5eae0..0bc29009703e 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c
@@ -820,7 +820,16 @@ static void ipmmu_probe_finalize(struct device *dev)
static void ipmmu_release_device(struct device *dev)
{
- arm_iommu_detach_device(dev);
+ struct dma_iommu_mapping *mapping = to_dma_iommu_mapping(dev);
+
+ if (!mapping) {
+ dev_warn(dev, "Not attached\n");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ arm_iommu_release_mapping(mapping);
+ to_dma_iommu_mapping(dev) = NULL;
+ set_dma_ops(dev, NULL);
}
After fixing this in ipmmu driver, we can safely put removing device and
release_device in a group->mutex critical region in two steps:
Step 1: Refactor iommu_group_remove_device() w/o functionality change:
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
index 05522eace439..17b2e358a6fd 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
@@ -1065,6 +1065,46 @@ int iommu_group_add_device(struct iommu_group
*group, struct device *dev)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_group_add_device);
+/*
+ * Remove a device from a group's device list and return the group device
+ * if successful.
+ */
+static struct group_device *
+__iommu_group_remove_device(struct iommu_group *group, struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct group_device *device;
+
+ lockdep_assert_held(&group->mutex);
+ list_for_each_entry(device, &group->devices, list) {
+ if (device->dev == dev) {
+ list_del(&device->list);
+ return device;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Release a device from its group and decrements the iommu group
reference
+ * count.
+ */
+static void __iommu_group_release_device(struct iommu_group *group,
+ struct group_device *grp_dev)
+{
+ struct device *dev = grp_dev->dev;
+
+ sysfs_remove_link(group->devices_kobj, grp_dev->name);
+ sysfs_remove_link(&dev->kobj, "iommu_group");
+
+ trace_remove_device_from_group(group->id, dev);
+
+ kfree(grp_dev->name);
+ kfree(grp_dev);
+ dev->iommu_group = NULL;
+ kobject_put(group->devices_kobj);
+}
+
/**
* iommu_group_remove_device - remove a device from it's current group
* @dev: device to be removed
@@ -1075,7 +1115,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_group_add_device);
void iommu_group_remove_device(struct device *dev)
{
struct iommu_group *group = dev->iommu_group;
- struct group_device *tmp_device, *device = NULL;
+ struct group_device *device;
if (!group)
return;
@@ -1083,27 +1123,11 @@ void iommu_group_remove_device(struct device *dev)
dev_info(dev, "Removing from iommu group %d\n", group->id);
mutex_lock(&group->mutex);
- list_for_each_entry(tmp_device, &group->devices, list) {
- if (tmp_device->dev == dev) {
- device = tmp_device;
- list_del(&device->list);
- break;
- }
- }
+ device = __iommu_group_remove_device(group, dev);
mutex_unlock(&group->mutex);
- if (!device)
- return;
-
- sysfs_remove_link(group->devices_kobj, device->name);
- sysfs_remove_link(&dev->kobj, "iommu_group");
-
- trace_remove_device_from_group(group->id, dev);
-
- kfree(device->name);
- kfree(device);
- dev->iommu_group = NULL;
- kobject_put(group->devices_kobj);
+ if (device)
+ __iommu_group_release_device(group, device);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_group_remove_device);
Step 2: Put removing group and release_device in a same critical region:
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
index 17b2e358a6fd..eeb2907472bc 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
@@ -101,6 +101,10 @@ static int
iommu_create_device_direct_mappings(struct iommu_group *group,
static struct iommu_group *iommu_group_get_for_dev(struct device *dev);
static ssize_t iommu_group_store_type(struct iommu_group *group,
const char *buf, size_t count);
+static struct group_device *
+__iommu_group_remove_device(struct iommu_group *group, struct device
*dev);
+static void __iommu_group_release_device(struct iommu_group *group,
+ struct group_device *grp_dev);
#define IOMMU_GROUP_ATTR(_name, _mode, _show, _store) \
struct iommu_group_attribute iommu_group_attr_##_name = \
@@ -466,18 +470,25 @@ int iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
void iommu_release_device(struct device *dev)
{
+ struct iommu_group *group = dev->iommu_group;
+ struct group_device *device;
const struct iommu_ops *ops;
- if (!dev->iommu)
+ if (!dev->iommu || !group)
return;
iommu_device_unlink(dev->iommu->iommu_dev, dev);
+ mutex_lock(&group->mutex);
ops = dev_iommu_ops(dev);
if (ops->release_device)
ops->release_device(dev);
+ device = __iommu_group_remove_device(group, dev);
+ mutex_unlock(&group->mutex);
+
+ if (device)
+ __iommu_group_release_device(group, device);
- iommu_group_remove_device(dev);
module_put(ops->owner);
dev_iommu_free(dev);
}
Best regards,
baolu