Re: [RFC PATCH] dt-bindings: dma: apple,sio: Add schema

[Martin Povišer]

> On 14. 2. 2023, at 17:12, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 15:10:53 +0100, Martin Povišer wrote:
>> Describe the SIO coprocessor which serves as pretend DMA controller on
>> recent Apple platforms.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Martin Povišer <povik+lin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> 
>> Since the schema mentions a loader preparing the binding appropriately,
>> here's a PR with the relevant (WIP) loader code, if anyone wants to look:
>> https://github.com/AsahiLinux/m1n1/pull/286
>> 
>> .../devicetree/bindings/dma/apple,sio.yaml    | 129 ++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 129 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/apple,sio.yaml
>> 
> 
> My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
> on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
> 
> yamllint warnings/errors:
> 
> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/apple,sio.example.dts:24.35-27.11: Warning (node_name_vs_property_name): /example-0/interrupt-controller: node name and property name conflict

I saw the warning, but since I had copied that part of the example from
apple,admac.yaml I didn’t make much of it. Now that I look at it again,
the example in apple,admac doesn’t raise the same warning, how come?

This is just a curiosity since we don’t need the aic node in the example
anyway (unlike in apple,admac where it’s needed because of empty entries
in interrupts-extended).

Martin