Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] Documentation: firmware-guide: gpio-properties: Clarify Explicit and Implicit

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Tue Feb 14 2023 - 09:52:05 EST


On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 9:39 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Clarify the Explicit and Implicit meanings in the table of Pull Bias.
>
> While at it, distinguish pull bias keywords used in ACPI by using bold
> font in the table of the respective terms.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v2: fixed formatting issues
> .../firmware-guide/acpi/gpio-properties.rst | 35 +++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/gpio-properties.rst b/Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/gpio-properties.rst
> index eaec732cc77c..db0c0b1f3700 100644
> --- a/Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/gpio-properties.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/gpio-properties.rst
> @@ -67,17 +67,30 @@ state of the output pin which driver should use during its initialization.
> Linux tries to use common sense here and derives the state from the bias
> and polarity settings. The table below shows the expectations:
>
> -========= ============= ==============
> -Pull Bias Polarity Requested...
> -========= ============= ==============
> -Implicit x AS IS (assumed firmware configured for us)
> -Explicit x (no _DSD) as Pull Bias (Up == High, Down == Low),
> - assuming non-active (Polarity = !Pull Bias)
> -Down Low as low, assuming active
> -Down High as low, assuming non-active
> -Up Low as high, assuming non-active
> -Up High as high, assuming active
> -========= ============= ==============
> ++-------------+-------------+-----------------------------------------------+
> +| Pull Bias | Polarity | Requested... |
> ++=============+=============+===============================================+
> +| Implicit |
> ++-------------+-------------+-----------------------------------------------+
> +| **Default** | x | AS IS (assumed firmware configured it for us) |
> ++-------------+-------------+-----------------------------------------------+
> +| Explicit |
> ++-------------+-------------+-----------------------------------------------+
> +| **None** | x | AS IS (assumed firmware configured it for us) |
> +| | | with no Pull Bias |
> ++-------------+-------------+-----------------------------------------------+
> +| **Up** | x (no _DSD) | |
> +| +-------------+ as high, assuming non-active |
> +| | Low | |
> +| +-------------+-----------------------------------------------+
> +| | High | as high, assuming active |
> ++-------------+-------------+-----------------------------------------------+
> +| **Down** | x (no _DSD) | |
> +| +-------------+ as low, assuming non-active |
> +| | High | |
> +| +-------------+-----------------------------------------------+
> +| | Low | as low, assuming active |
> ++-------------+-------------+-----------------------------------------------+
>
> That said, for our above example the both GPIOs, since the bias setting
> is explicit and _DSD is present, will be treated as active with a high
> --

Applied as 6.3 material, thanks!