Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: add dp controller

[Neil Armstrong]

On 13/02/2023 13:32, neil.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On 10/02/2023 16:54, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On 10/02/2023 17:28, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> > > On 10/02/2023 16:24, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > > On 10/02/2023 16:44, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> > > > > Add the Display Port controller subnode to the MDSS node.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > >   1 file changed, 79 insertions(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
> > > > > index 6caa2c8efb46..72d54beb7d7c 100644
> > > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
> > > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
> > > > > @@ -2751,6 +2751,13 @@ dpu_intf2_out: endpoint {
> > > > >                           };
> > > > >                       };
> > > > > +                    port@2 {
> > > > > +                        reg = <2>;
> > > > > +                        dpu_intf0_out: endpoint {
> > > > > +                            remote-endpoint = <&mdss_dp0_in>;
> > > > > +                        };
> > > > > +                    };
> > > > > +
> > > > >                   };
> > > > >                   mdp_opp_table: opp-table {
> > > > > @@ -2783,6 +2790,78 @@ opp-500000000 {
> > > > >                   };
> > > > >               };
> > > > > +            mdss_dp0: displayport-controller@ae90000 {
> > > > > +                compatible = "qcom,sm8350-dp";
> > >
> > > Exact, must fix.
> > >
> > > > Missing "qcom,sm8450-dp". As I wrote in the comment to patch 1, I'd suggest having just a single entry here rather than keeping both 8350 and 8450 entries.
> > > >
> > > > > +                reg = <0 0xae90000 0 0xfc>,
> > > > > +                      <0 0xae90200 0 0xc0>,
> > > > > +                      <0 0xae90400 0 0x770>,
> > > > > +                      <0 0xae91000 0 0x98>,
> > > > > +                      <0 0xae91400 0 0x98>;
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > While this sounds correct, usually we used the even size here (0x200, 0x400, etc.). Can we please switch to it (especially since sm8350-dp uses even sizes).
> > >
> > > I don't have access to registers layout for HDK8450 but the system freezes when using even sizes, using
> > > the exact register size works fine.
> >
> > Interesting. Could you please trace, what exactly makes it fail, since specifying bigger region size should not cause such issues.
>
> Yep I'll trace what's happening.

OK weird, I tried with the same sizes as sm8350, and it works fine.

Will resend with this fixed.

Neil

> Neil
>
> >