Re: [PATCH 03/10] drm/msm/dsi: Zero-terminate msm_dsi_config::io_start
From: Dmitry Baryshkov
Date: Sat Feb 11 2023 - 08:19:17 EST
On 11/02/2023 13:51, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
In preparation for supporting multiple sets of possible base registers,
Zero-terminate the array that contains them to remove the need of
specifying num_dsi for each set.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_cfg.c | 39 ++++++++++--------------------
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_cfg.h | 4 +--
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_cfg.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_cfg.c
index 068d45b3a8f0..5f62c563bd1c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_cfg.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_cfg.c
@@ -22,9 +22,8 @@ static const struct msm_dsi_config apq8064_dsi_cfg = {
.bus_clk_names = dsi_v2_bus_clk_names,
.num_bus_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(dsi_v2_bus_clk_names),
.io_start = {
- { 0x4700000, 0x5800000 },
+ { 0x4700000, 0x5800000, 0 },
},
- .num_dsi = 2,
};
static const char * const dsi_6g_bus_clk_names[] = {
@@ -44,9 +43,8 @@ static const struct msm_dsi_config msm8974_apq8084_dsi_cfg = {
.bus_clk_names = dsi_6g_bus_clk_names,
.num_bus_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(dsi_6g_bus_clk_names),
.io_start = {
- { 0xfd922800, 0xfd922b00 },
+ { 0xfd922800, 0xfd922b00, 0 },
},
- .num_dsi = 2,
};
static const char * const dsi_8916_bus_clk_names[] = {
@@ -65,9 +63,8 @@ static const struct msm_dsi_config msm8916_dsi_cfg = {
.bus_clk_names = dsi_8916_bus_clk_names,
.num_bus_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(dsi_8916_bus_clk_names),
.io_start = {
- { 0x1a98000 },
+ { 0x1a98000, 0 },
},
- .num_dsi = 1,
};
static const char * const dsi_8976_bus_clk_names[] = {
@@ -86,9 +83,8 @@ static const struct msm_dsi_config msm8976_dsi_cfg = {
.bus_clk_names = dsi_8976_bus_clk_names,
.num_bus_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(dsi_8976_bus_clk_names),
.io_start = {
- { 0x1a94000, 0x1a96000 },
+ { 0x1a94000, 0x1a96000, 0 },
},
- .num_dsi = 2,
};
static const struct regulator_bulk_data msm8994_dsi_regulators[] = {
@@ -107,9 +103,8 @@ static const struct msm_dsi_config msm8994_dsi_cfg = {
.bus_clk_names = dsi_6g_bus_clk_names,
.num_bus_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(dsi_6g_bus_clk_names),
.io_start = {
- { 0xfd998000, 0xfd9a0000 },
+ { 0xfd998000, 0xfd9a0000, 0 },
},
- .num_dsi = 2,
};
static const char * const dsi_8996_bus_clk_names[] = {
@@ -129,9 +124,8 @@ static const struct msm_dsi_config msm8996_dsi_cfg = {
.bus_clk_names = dsi_8996_bus_clk_names,
.num_bus_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(dsi_8996_bus_clk_names),
.io_start = {
- { 0x994000, 0x996000 },
+ { 0x994000, 0x996000, 0 },
},
- .num_dsi = 2,
};
static const char * const dsi_msm8998_bus_clk_names[] = {
@@ -150,9 +144,8 @@ static const struct msm_dsi_config msm8998_dsi_cfg = {
.bus_clk_names = dsi_msm8998_bus_clk_names,
.num_bus_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(dsi_msm8998_bus_clk_names),
.io_start = {
- { 0xc994000, 0xc996000 },
+ { 0xc994000, 0xc996000, 0 },
},
- .num_dsi = 2,
};
static const char * const dsi_sdm660_bus_clk_names[] = {
@@ -170,9 +163,8 @@ static const struct msm_dsi_config sdm660_dsi_cfg = {
.bus_clk_names = dsi_sdm660_bus_clk_names,
.num_bus_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(dsi_sdm660_bus_clk_names),
.io_start = {
- { 0xc994000, 0xc996000 },
+ { 0xc994000, 0xc996000, 0 },
},
- .num_dsi = 2,
};
static const char * const dsi_sdm845_bus_clk_names[] = {
@@ -194,9 +186,8 @@ static const struct msm_dsi_config sdm845_dsi_cfg = {
.bus_clk_names = dsi_sdm845_bus_clk_names,
.num_bus_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(dsi_sdm845_bus_clk_names),
.io_start = {
- { 0xae94000, 0xae96000 },
+ { 0xae94000, 0xae96000, 0 },
},
- .num_dsi = 2,
};
static const struct regulator_bulk_data sm8550_dsi_regulators[] = {
@@ -210,9 +201,8 @@ static const struct msm_dsi_config sm8550_dsi_cfg = {
.bus_clk_names = dsi_sdm845_bus_clk_names,
.num_bus_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(dsi_sdm845_bus_clk_names),
.io_start = {
- { 0xae94000, 0xae96000 },
+ { 0xae94000, 0xae96000, 0 },
},
- .num_dsi = 2,
};
static const struct regulator_bulk_data sc7180_dsi_regulators[] = {
@@ -226,9 +216,8 @@ static const struct msm_dsi_config sc7180_dsi_cfg = {
.bus_clk_names = dsi_sc7180_bus_clk_names,
.num_bus_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(dsi_sc7180_bus_clk_names),
.io_start = {
- { 0xae94000 },
+ { 0xae94000, 0 },
},
- .num_dsi = 1,
};
static const char * const dsi_sc7280_bus_clk_names[] = {
@@ -246,9 +235,8 @@ static const struct msm_dsi_config sc7280_dsi_cfg = {
.bus_clk_names = dsi_sc7280_bus_clk_names,
.num_bus_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(dsi_sc7280_bus_clk_names),
.io_start = {
- { 0xae94000, 0xae96000 },
+ { 0xae94000, 0xae96000, 0 },
},
- .num_dsi = 2,
};
static const char * const dsi_qcm2290_bus_clk_names[] = {
@@ -266,9 +254,8 @@ static const struct msm_dsi_config qcm2290_dsi_cfg = {
.bus_clk_names = dsi_qcm2290_bus_clk_names,
.num_bus_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(dsi_qcm2290_bus_clk_names),
.io_start = {
- { 0x5e94000 },
+ { 0x5e94000, 0 },
},
- .num_dsi = 1,
};
static const struct msm_dsi_host_cfg_ops msm_dsi_v2_host_ops = {
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_cfg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_cfg.h
index df9f09876ccb..03493cc6b772 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_cfg.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_cfg.h
@@ -41,8 +41,8 @@ struct msm_dsi_config {
int num_regulators;
const char * const *bus_clk_names;
const int num_bus_clks;
- const resource_size_t io_start[VARIANTS_MAX][DSI_MAX];
- const int num_dsi;
+ /* Allow + 1 entry for the zero-terminator */
+ const resource_size_t io_start[VARIANTS_MAX][DSI_MAX + 1];
};
struct msm_dsi_host_cfg_ops {
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c
index 22ba8726b0ea..f5092b4d0757 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c
@@ -1868,7 +1868,7 @@ static int dsi_host_get_id(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host)
if (!res)
return -EINVAL;
- for (i = 0; i < cfg->num_dsi; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; cfg->io_start[0][i]; i++) {
if (cfg->io_start[0][i] == res->start)
return i;
}
I think we have the easier way to do this: always loop towards DSI_MAX.
Empty cells will contain the value of 0 which can not match against
valid starting address.
Also please shift this patch to the first place, it will be logical to
add VARIANT_MAX after removing num_dsi.
--
With best wishes
Dmitry