Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: dts: qcom: thinkpad-x13s: Add bluetooth

[Steev Klimaszewski]

>On 31/01/2023 05:38, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Steev Klimaszewski <steev@xxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  .../qcom/sc8280xp-lenovo-thinkpad-x13s.dts    | 68 +++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 68 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp-lenovo-thinkpad-x13s.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp-lenovo-thinkpad-x13s.dts
>> index f936b020a71d..951438ac5946 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp-lenovo-thinkpad-x13s.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp-lenovo-thinkpad-x13s.dts
>> @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ / {
>>  	aliases {
>>  		i2c4 = &i2c4;
>>  		i2c21 = &i2c21;
>> +		serial0 = &uart17;
>> +		serial1 = &uart2;
>>  	};
>>  
>>  	wcd938x: audio-codec {
>> @@ -712,6 +714,32 @@ &qup0 {
>>  	status = "okay";
>>  };
>>  
>> +&uart2 {
>> +	status = "okay";
>> +
>> +	pinctrl-names = "default";
>> +	pinctrl-0 = <&uart2_state>;
>> +
>> +	bluetooth {
>> +		compatible = "qcom,wcn6855-bt";
>> +
>> +/*

> Why dead code should be in the kernel?

As mentioned in the cover letter, this is a bit closer to an RFC than ready to
go in, and I do apologize that it wasn't clear enough.  I do not have access to
the schematics, and based on my reading of the schema for bluetooth, these
entries are supposed to be required, however, like the wcn6750, I have dummy
data entered into the qca_soc_data_wcn6855 struct.  I know that these should be
there, I just do not have access to the correct information to put, if that
makes sense?


<snip>

>Does not look like you tested the DTS against bindings. Please run `make
>dtbs_check` (see Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-schema.rst
>for instructions).

Correct I had not, but I have now, and will make the corrections test and they
will be included in v3.

>Best regards,
>Krzysztof

I appreciate the guidance for what I was doing incorrectly.

-- steev