Re: [PATCH 2/6] clk: qcom: ipq9574: Enable APSS clock driver

From: Devi Priya
Date: Tue Jan 31 2023 - 04:39:39 EST


Thanks Dmitry for taking time to review the patch!

On 1/31/2023 2:59 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On 13/01/2023 16:36, devi priya wrote:
Enable APSS clock driver for IPQ9574 based devices

Co-developed-by: Praveenkumar I <quic_ipkumar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Praveenkumar I <quic_ipkumar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: devi priya <quic_devipriy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/clk/qcom/apss-ipq-pll.c         | 13 +++++++++++++
  drivers/mailbox/qcom-apcs-ipc-mailbox.c |  5 +++++

Note, the drivers/mailbox isn't a part of the 'drivers/clk', so it should go to a separate patch (and it will be handled by a different maintainer).

Sure, got it. will split the changes in V2
  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/apss-ipq-pll.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/apss-ipq-pll.c
index a5aea27eb867..dd0c01bf5a98 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/qcom/apss-ipq-pll.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/apss-ipq-pll.c
@@ -61,6 +61,18 @@ static const struct alpha_pll_config ipq8074_pll_config = {
      .test_ctl_hi_val = 0x4000,
  };
+static const struct alpha_pll_config ipq9574_pll_config = {
+    .l = 0x3b,
+    .config_ctl_val = 0x200D4828,
+    .config_ctl_hi_val = 0x6,
+    .early_output_mask = BIT(3),
+    .aux2_output_mask = BIT(2),
+    .aux_output_mask = BIT(1),
+    .main_output_mask = BIT(0),
+    .test_ctl_val = 0x0,
+    .test_ctl_hi_val = 0x4000,
+};
+
  static const struct regmap_config ipq_pll_regmap_config = {
      .reg_bits        = 32,
      .reg_stride        = 4,
@@ -102,6 +114,7 @@ static int apss_ipq_pll_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  static const struct of_device_id apss_ipq_pll_match_table[] = {
      { .compatible = "qcom,ipq6018-a53pll", .data = &ipq6018_pll_config },
      { .compatible = "qcom,ipq8074-a53pll", .data = &ipq8074_pll_config },
+    { .compatible = "qcom,ipq9574-a73pll", .data = &ipq9574_pll_config },
      { }
  };
  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, apss_ipq_pll_match_table);
diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/qcom-apcs-ipc-mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/qcom-apcs-ipc-mailbox.c
index 0e9f9cba8668..90e74f9d7cb3 100644
--- a/drivers/mailbox/qcom-apcs-ipc-mailbox.c
+++ b/drivers/mailbox/qcom-apcs-ipc-mailbox.c
@@ -33,6 +33,10 @@ static const struct qcom_apcs_ipc_data ipq6018_apcs_data = {
      .offset = 8, .clk_name = "qcom,apss-ipq6018-clk"
  };
+static const struct qcom_apcs_ipc_data ipq9574_apcs_data = {
+    .offset = 8, .clk_name = "qcom,apss-ipq6018-clk"
+};

As the data is identical to ipq6018's one, please don't add a duplicate of it.

Sure, okay
+
  static const struct qcom_apcs_ipc_data msm8916_apcs_data = {
      .offset = 8, .clk_name = "qcom-apcs-msm8916-clk"
  };
@@ -143,6 +147,7 @@ static int qcom_apcs_ipc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
  static const struct of_device_id qcom_apcs_ipc_of_match[] = {
      { .compatible = "qcom,ipq6018-apcs-apps-global", .data = &ipq6018_apcs_data },
      { .compatible = "qcom,ipq8074-apcs-apps-global", .data = &ipq6018_apcs_data },
+    { .compatible = "qcom,ipq9574-apcs-apps-global", .data = &ipq9574_apcs_data },
      { .compatible = "qcom,msm8916-apcs-kpss-global", .data = &msm8916_apcs_data },
      { .compatible = "qcom,msm8939-apcs-kpss-global", .data = &msm8916_apcs_data },
      { .compatible = "qcom,msm8953-apcs-kpss-global", .data = &msm8994_apcs_data },

Best Regards,
Devi Priya