Re: [PATCH] interconnect: Skip call into provider if initial bw is zero

[Abel Vesa]

On 23-01-23 22:58:49, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 23/01/2023 20:37, Mike Tipton wrote:
> > 
> > This isn't actually changing it for all providers. Only for those that
> > define the get_bw() callback. Right now that's only qcom/msm8974 and
> > imx/imx. If get_bw() isn't defined, then icc_node_add() defaults to
> > INT_MAX. So, the logical behavior in that case is unchanged. Which means
> > this isn't even changing the behavior for rpmh yet, either.
> 
> Yes that adds up.
> 
> Looking at the commit for get_bw() for the 8974, I think this change would
> be OK with the intent of this commit
> 
> commit 9caf2d956cfa254c6d89c5f4d7b3f8235d75b28f
> Author: Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:   Mon Nov 9 14:45:12 2020 +0200
> 
> @Abel what effect will skipping pre->aggregation() have on i.MX ?

I don't think there is any impact on i.MX platforms.

Peng, any input?

> 
> ---
> bod