Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] two suggested iouring op audit updates

[Jens Axboe]

On 1/27/23 3:38 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 2:43 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 1/27/23 12:42 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 12:40 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On 1/27/23 10:23 AM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
>>>>> A couple of updates to the iouring ops audit bypass selections suggested in
>>>>> consultation with Steve Grubb.
>>>>>
>>>>> Richard Guy Briggs (2):
>>>>>   io_uring,audit: audit IORING_OP_FADVISE but not IORING_OP_MADVISE
>>>>>   io_uring,audit: do not log IORING_OP_*GETXATTR
>>>>>
>>>>>  io_uring/opdef.c | 4 +++-
>>>>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> Look fine to me - we should probably add stable to both of them, just
>>>> to keep things consistent across releases. I can queue them up for 6.3.
>>>
>>> Please hold off until I've had a chance to look them over ...
>>
>> I haven't taken anything yet, for things like this I always let it
>> simmer until people have had a chance to do so.
> 
> Thanks.  FWIW, that sounds very reasonable to me, but I've seen lots
> of different behaviors across subsystems and wanted to make sure we
> were on the same page.

Sounds fair. BTW, can we stop CC'ing closed lists on patch
submissions? Getting these:

Your message to Linux-audit awaits moderator approval

on every reply is really annoying.

-- 
Jens Axboe