Re: [PATCH v8 10/10] mm: Renumber FOLL_PIN and FOLL_GET down

[David Howells]

Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> What is the 3rd state?

Consider a network filesystem message generated for a direct I/O that the
network filesystem does zerocopy on.  You may have an sk_buff that has
fragments from one or more of three different sources:

 (1) Fragments consisting of specifically allocated pages, such as the
     IP/UDP/TCP headers that have refs taken on them.

 (2) Fragments consisting of zerocopy kernel buffers that has neither refs nor
     pins belonging to the sk_buff.

     iov_iter_extract_pages() will not take pins when extracting from, say, an
     XARRAY-type or KVEC-type iterator.  iov_iter_extract_mode() will return
     0.

 (3) Fragments consisting of zerocopy user buffers that have pins taken on
     them belonging to the sk_buff.

     iov_iter_extract_pages() will take pins when extracting from, say, a
     UBUF-type or IOVEC-type iterator.  iov_iter_extract_mode() will return
     FOLL_PIN (at the moment).

So you have three states: Ref'd, pinned and no-retention.

David