Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/3] bpf: Use BPF_KFUNC macro at all kfunc definitions

[Jonathan Corbet]

David Vernet <void@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I was perhaps a bit naive to think we could just throw a __bpf_kfunc
> macro onto the function signatures and call it a day :-) I think it's
> probably best to table this for now, and either I or someone else can
> come back to it when we have bandwidth to solve the problem more
> appropriately.

Now I feel bad ... I was just tossing out a thought, not wanting to
bikeshed this work into oblivion.  If what you have solves a real
problem and is the best that can be done now, perhaps it should just go
in and a "more appropriate" solution can be adopted later, should
somebody manage to come up with it?

Thanks,

jon