Re: [PATCH v2] platform/chrome: cros_ec_typec: allow deferred probe of switch handles

From: Victor Ding
Date: Tue Jan 24 2023 - 02:47:00 EST


On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 5:57 PM Guenter Roeck <groeck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:16 PM Victor Ding <victording@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > `fwnode_typec_{retimer,mux,switch}_get()` could return `-EPROBE_DEFER`,
> > which is called from `cros_typec_get_switch_handles`. When this happens,
> > it does not indicate absence of switches; instead, it only hints that
> > probing of switches should occur at a later time.
> >
> > Progagate `-EPROBE_DEFER` to upper layer logic so that they can re-try
> > probing switches as a better time.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Victor Ding <victording@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Coverted switch-block to nested if-blocks.
> >
> > drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++---------
> > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c
> > index 59de4ce01fab..580f3bdf091c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c
> > +++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c
> > @@ -145,31 +145,37 @@ static int cros_typec_get_switch_handles(struct cros_typec_port *port,
> > struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> > struct device *dev)
> > {
> > + int ret = 0;
> > +
> > port->mux = fwnode_typec_mux_get(fwnode, NULL);
> > if (IS_ERR(port->mux)) {
> > - dev_dbg(dev, "Mux handle not found.\n");
> > + ret = PTR_ERR(port->mux);
> > + dev_dbg(dev, "Mux handle not found: %d.\n", ret);
> > goto mux_err;
> > }
> >
> > port->retimer = fwnode_typec_retimer_get(fwnode);
> > if (IS_ERR(port->retimer)) {
> > - dev_dbg(dev, "Retimer handle not found.\n");
> > + ret = PTR_ERR(port->retimer);
> > + dev_dbg(dev, "Retimer handle not found: %d.\n", ret);
> > goto retimer_sw_err;
> > }
> >
> > port->ori_sw = fwnode_typec_switch_get(fwnode);
> > if (IS_ERR(port->ori_sw)) {
> > - dev_dbg(dev, "Orientation switch handle not found.\n");
> > + ret = PTR_ERR(port->ori_sw);
> > + dev_dbg(dev, "Orientation switch handle not found: %d\n", ret);
> > goto ori_sw_err;
> > }
> >
> > port->role_sw = fwnode_usb_role_switch_get(fwnode);
> > if (IS_ERR(port->role_sw)) {
> > - dev_dbg(dev, "USB role switch handle not found.\n");
> > + ret = PTR_ERR(port->role_sw);
> > + dev_dbg(dev, "USB role switch handle not found: %d\n", ret);
> > goto role_sw_err;
> > }
> >
> > - return 0;
> > + return ret;
> >
>
> This change is pointless.
Sure, I'll revert this line to `return 0` in the next revision.
>
> Guenter
>
> > role_sw_err:
> > typec_switch_put(port->ori_sw);
> > @@ -181,7 +187,7 @@ static int cros_typec_get_switch_handles(struct cros_typec_port *port,
> > typec_mux_put(port->mux);
> > port->mux = NULL;
> > mux_err:
> > - return -ENODEV;
> > + return ret;
> > }
> >
> > static int cros_typec_add_partner(struct cros_typec_data *typec, int port_num,
> > @@ -423,9 +429,11 @@ static int cros_typec_init_ports(struct cros_typec_data *typec)
> > }
> >
> > ret = cros_typec_get_switch_handles(cros_port, fwnode, dev);
> > - if (ret)
> > - dev_dbg(dev, "No switch control for port %d\n",
> > - port_num);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_dbg(dev, "No switch control for port %d, err: %d\n", port_num, ret);
> > + if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > + goto unregister_ports;
> > + }
> >
> > ret = cros_typec_register_port_altmodes(typec, port_num);
> > if (ret) {
> > --
> > 2.39.1.405.gd4c25cc71f-goog
> >