[PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Clean up a return statement

From: Dan Carpenter
Date: Mon Jan 23 2023 - 10:07:18 EST


The comments say "enabled" where "disabled" is intended. Also it's
cleaner to return zero explicitly instead of ret.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
index d21c7eafd641..703f16ef3953 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
@@ -2739,8 +2739,8 @@ static int scmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (ret)
goto clear_dev_req_notifier;

- /* Bail out anyway when coex enabled */
- return ret;
+ /* Bail out anyway when coex disabled. */
+ return 0;
}

/* Coex enabled, carry on in any case. */
--
2.35.1