Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: panel: Set orientation on panel_bridge connector

[Laurent Pinchart]

Hello,

On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 05:58:11PM +0000, John Keeping wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 09:57:18AM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 01:44:38PM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 3:43 AM John Keeping wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Commit 15b9ca1641f0 ("drm: Config orientation property if panel provides
> > > > it") added a helper to set the panel panel orientation early but only
> > > > connected this for drm_bridge_connector, which constructs a panel bridge
> > > > with DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR and creates the connector itself.
> > > >
> > > > When the DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR flag is not specified and the
> > > > panel_bridge creates its own connector the orientation is not set unless
> > > > the panel does it in .get_modes which is too late and leads to a warning
> > > > splat from __drm_mode_object_add() because the device is already
> > > > registered.
> > > >
> > > > Call the necessary function to set add the orientation property when the
> > > > connector is created so that it is available before the device is
> > > > registered.
> > > 
> > > I have no huge objection to your patch and it looks OK to me. That
> > > being said, my understanding is that:
> > > 
> > > 1. DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR is "the future" and not using the
> > > flag is "deprecated".
> >
> > Correct.
> > Could we take a look at how much is required to move the relevant driver
> > to use DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR?
> >
> > If this is too much work now we may land this simple patch, but the
> > preference is to move all drivers to the new bridge handling and thus
> > asking display drivers to create the connector.

I fully agree with Doug and Sam here. Let's see if we can keep the yak
shaving minimal :-)

> > What display driver are we dealing with here?
> 
> This is dw-mipi-dsi-rockchip which uses the component path in
> dw-mipi-dsi (and, in fact, is the only driver using that mode of
> dw-mipi-dsi).
> 
> I'm not familiar enough with DRM to say whether it's easy to convert to
> DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR - should dw-mipi-dsi-rockchip be moving
> to use dw-mipi-dsi as a bridge driver or should dw_mipi_dsi_bind() have
> a drm_bridge_attach_flags argument?  But I'm happy to test patches if it
> looks easy to convert to you :-)

I'd go for the former (use dw_mipi_dsi_probe() and acquire the DSI
bridge with of_drm_find_bridge() instead of using the component
framework) if possible, but I don't know how intrusive that would be.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart