Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/8] Resend LED patches

From: Arnd Bergmann
Date: Fri Jan 20 2023 - 12:48:25 EST


On Fri, Jan 20, 2023, at 18:15, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jan 2023, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

>> > Marek Behún (3):
>> > leds: turris-omnia: support HW controlled mode via private trigger
>> > leds: turris-omnia: initialize multi-intensity to full
>> > leds: turris-omnia: change max brightness from 255 to 1
>> >
>> > Pali Rohár (5):
>> > dt-bindings: leds: register-bit-led: Add active-low property
>> > leds: syscon: Implement support for active-low property
>> > powerpc/85xx: DTS: Add CPLD definitions for P1021RDB Combo Board CPL
>> > Design
>> > dt-bindings: leds: Add cznic,turris1x-leds.yaml binding
>> > leds: Add support for Turris 1.x LEDs
>> >
>> > .../testing/sysfs-class-led-driver-turris1x | 31 ++
>> > .../bindings/leds/cznic,turris1x-leds.yaml | 118 +++++
>> > .../bindings/leds/register-bit-led.yaml | 5 +
>> > arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p1020mbg-pc.dtsi | 92 ++++
>> > arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p1020mbg-pc_32b.dts | 6 +-
>> > arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p1020mbg-pc_36b.dts | 6 +-
>> > arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p1020rdb-pd.dts | 44 +-
>> > arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p1020utm-pc.dtsi | 37 ++
>> > arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p1020utm-pc_32b.dts | 4 +-
>> > arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p1020utm-pc_36b.dts | 4 +-
>> > arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p1021rdb-pc.dtsi | 37 ++
>> > arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p1021rdb-pc_32b.dts | 5 +-
>> > arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p1021rdb-pc_36b.dts | 5 +-
>> > arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p2020rdb-pc.dtsi | 33 +-
>
>> > drivers/leds/Kconfig | 10 +
>> > drivers/leds/Makefile | 1 +
>> > drivers/leds/leds-syscon.c | 14 +-
>> > drivers/leds/leds-turris-1x.c | 474 ++++++++++++++++++
>> > drivers/leds/leds-turris-omnia.c | 46 +-
>
> If everyone is convinced that applying these drivers is the correct
> thing to do, I'd be happy to (rather) take them via LEDs.

Ok, thanks. I had not actually looked at the patches until today.
They were in the soc tree backlog but appeared to be misplaced
there until I read the 0/10 message text.

Looking at it now, I see:

- patches 1 and 2 seem obvious and have been reviewed by
others already

- patch 3 is for arch/powerpc and should get merged through
there if there are no objections to the binding in patch 4.

- patch 5 is the big driver patch, with a Reviewed-by tag
from Marek Behún, who is the author of the last three patches.
An earlier version of this patch was sent in June and got
a few Acks and detailed feedback from Andy [1], but he's also
not on Cc, and I don't know if his comments are all resolved
in this version.

- Patches 6, 7 and 8 all seem simple LED subsystem patches,
they just need review from you in order to get applied.
These are also missing a Signed-off-by from the submitter
in addition to the author in order to be applied.

Arnd

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHp75Vcr6o2rm+T6Tr8sS4VXCLVHtmLPWy-njOKAvO4AcZoW=A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/