Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-msm-lumag tree with Linus', drm-msm trees

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 12:23:50 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the drm-msm-lumag tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
> 
> between commits:
> 
>   d73b1d02de08 ("drm/msm: Hangcheck progress detection")
>   8636500300a0 ("drm/msm: Fix failure paths in msm_drm_init()")
> 
> from Linus', drm-msm trees and commit:
> 
>   643b7d0869cc ("drm/msm: Add missing check and destroy for alloc_ordered_workqueue")
> 
> from the drm-msm-lumag tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

Actually, the fixup was this:

f39d6f85acf03a184bb086cae8fd24d2c6d787fe
diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
index 0509e90d05e3,b052327181b2..d476c4ff0dd5
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
@@@ -420,7 -418,11 +420,9 @@@ static int msm_drm_init(struct device *
  	priv->dev = ddev;
  
  	priv->wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("msm", 0);
+ 	if (!priv->wq)
+ 		return -ENOMEM;
  
 -	priv->hangcheck_period = DRM_MSM_HANGCHECK_DEFAULT_PERIOD;
 -
  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&priv->objects);
  	mutex_init(&priv->obj_lock);
  
@@@ -542,8 -544,6 +544,7 @@@
  
  err_msm_uninit:
  	msm_drm_uninit(dev);
- err_drm_dev_put:
 +	drm_dev_put(ddev);
  	return ret;
  }
  

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Attachment: pgppf4np7A4u8.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature