Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the nfsd tree

[Chuck Lever III]

> On Jan 17, 2023, at 4:00 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Hi Chuck,
> 
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 14:28:42 +0000 Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Jan 16, 2023, at 7:52 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Chuck,
>>> 
>>> On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 14:33:06 +0000 Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:  
>>>> 
>>>> Sorry, I wasn't clear. I need nfsd's for-rc to be picked
>>>> up and merged into linux-next before I send a PR.
>>>> 
>>>> I've trimmed for-next to temporarily remove the duplicate
>>>> commit, so you should now be able to continue merging both
>>>> into linux-next without an issue.  
>>> 
>>> I am not sure what you mean.  Your for-rc branch has been in linux-next
>>> for a long time and the current version (SHA 7c24fa225081) was merged
>>> last Friday.  
>> 
>> My bad. I was looking in the wrong place.
> 
> No worries.
> 
>>> For clarity, the cel-fixes tree and the nfsd tree are both branches of
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cel/linux - the for-rc
>>> and for-next branches respectively.
>>> 
>>> Maybe I should rename cel-fixes to be nfsd-fixes?  
>> 
>> Renaming my source branch as well would make things a little more clear.
>> 
>> How about I name the branches in my repo nfsd-next and nfsd-fixes?
> 
> Yes, that sounds good.  Let me know when you have done that and I will
> update my end.  In the mean time, I will rename the cel-fixes tree to
> nfsd-fixes.

That's now been done for-rc -> nfsd-fixes and for-next -> nfsd-next.

--
Chuck Lever