Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: set *_data_age_threshold according to user_block_count

From: qixiaoyu
Date: Tue Jan 17 2023 - 06:57:15 EST


On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 06:30:42PM +0800, Yangtao Li via Linux-f2fs-devel wrote:
> Commit 71644dff4811 ("f2fs: add block_age-based extent cache")
> introduce age extent cache, which experimental data is based on
> a 128G storage device, and hot and warm data age threshold are
> set to 1G and 10G respectively. But it is unreasonable to set
> this value to 1G or 10G by default, which varies depending on
> the environment. For small storage devices, some storage devices
> do not even have 10G.
>
> Let's change hot and warm data age threshold to 1% and 10% of
> user_block_count respectively.
>

Hi Yangtao,

Thanks for your patch.

The block age here refers to total data blocks allocated of filesystem
between two consecutive updates. So, it has nothing to do with storage
size.

> Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs | 6 ++----
> fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c | 2 --
> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 9 +++++----
> fs/f2fs/super.c | 2 ++
> 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs
> index 75420c242cc4..c7952f1baf59 100644
> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs
> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs
> @@ -660,15 +660,13 @@ What: /sys/fs/f2fs/<disk>/hot_data_age_threshold
> Date: November 2022
> Contact: "Ping Xiong" <xiongping1@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Description: When DATA SEPARATION is on, it controls the age threshold to indicate
> - the data blocks as hot. By default it was initialized as 262144 blocks
> - (equals to 1GB).
> + the data blocks as hot. By default it was initialized as 1% of user_block_count.
>
> What: /sys/fs/f2fs/<disk>/warm_data_age_threshold
> Date: November 2022
> Contact: "Ping Xiong" <xiongping1@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Description: When DATA SEPARATION is on, it controls the age threshold to indicate
> - the data blocks as warm. By default it was initialized as 2621440 blocks
> - (equals to 10GB).
> + the data blocks as warm. By default it was initialized as 10% of user_block_count.
>
> What: /sys/fs/f2fs/<disk>/fault_rate
> Date: May 2016
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
> index 1daf8c88c09b..9c7e304d5660 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
> @@ -1235,8 +1235,6 @@ void f2fs_init_extent_cache_info(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>
> /* initialize for block age extents */
> atomic64_set(&sbi->allocated_data_blocks, 0);
> - sbi->hot_data_age_threshold = DEF_HOT_DATA_AGE_THRESHOLD;
> - sbi->warm_data_age_threshold = DEF_WARM_DATA_AGE_THRESHOLD;
> }
>
> int __init f2fs_create_extent_cache(void)
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> index f3c5f7740c1a..3b853c302a43 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> @@ -615,11 +615,12 @@ enum {
> #define SAME_AGE_REGION 1024
>
> /*
> - * Define data block with age less than 1GB as hot data
> - * define data block with age less than 10GB but more than 1GB as warm data
> + * Define data block with age less than 1% of user_block_count as hot data
> + * Define data block with age less than 10% of user_block_count but more
> + * than 1% of user_block_count as warm data
> */
> -#define DEF_HOT_DATA_AGE_THRESHOLD 262144
> -#define DEF_WARM_DATA_AGE_THRESHOLD 2621440
> +#define DEF_HOT_DATA_AGE_THRESHOLD 1
> +#define DEF_WARM_DATA_AGE_THRESHOLD 10
>
> /* extent cache type */
> enum extent_type {
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> index 5fc83771042d..8333ea5b8ffd 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> @@ -4088,6 +4088,8 @@ static void f2fs_tuning_parameters(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> BIT(F2FS_IPU_HONOR_OPU_WRITE);
> }
>
> + sbi->hot_data_age_threshold = sbi->user_block_count * DEF_HOT_DATA_AGE_THRESHOLD / 100;
> + sbi->warm_data_age_threshold = sbi->user_block_count * DEF_WARM_DATA_AGE_THRESHOLD / 100;
> sbi->readdir_ra = true;
> }
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> Linux-f2fs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel