Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: sram: Tightly Coupled Memory (TCM) bindings

[Tanmay Shah]

On 1/15/23 6:38 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 13/01/2023 19:08, Tanmay Shah wrote:
> > On 1/12/23 11:52 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > On 13/01/2023 08:30, Tanmay Shah wrote:
> > > > This patch introduces bindings for TCM memory address space on AMD-xilinx
> > > > platforms. As of now TCM addresses are hardcoded in xilinx remoteproc
> > > > driver. This bindings will help in defining TCM in device-tree and
> > > > make it's access platform agnostic and data-driven from the driver.
> > > Subject: drop second/last, redundant "bindings". The "dt-bindings"
> > > prefix is already stating that these are bindings.
> > Ack.
> >
> >
> > > Where is driver or DTS? Are you now adding a dead binding without users?
> >
> > TCM is used by drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c driver. Howerver,
> > we have hardcode addresses in TCM as bindings are not available yet.
> I don't see usage of these compatibles there. You also did not supply
> DTS here. Please provide users of bindings within the same patchset.


ACK. I will supply dts as well.

However, Is it ok if I convert this patch to RFC patch, and once 
bindings are fixed I will send actual patch with driver support.

If bindings design is not correct then I might have to change 
corresponding driver design lot.


> Best regards,
> Krzysztof