Re: [PATCH] Documentation: kvm: fix SRCU locking order docs

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 1/13/23 11:33, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > It's missing an important testcase; if it passes (does not warn), then
> > it should work:
>
> I think it does.

What I'm worried about is a false positive, not a false negative, so I'm 
afraid your test may not cover this.  I replied in the thread with 
Boqun's patches.

Paolo