Re: Is there a reason why REQ_OP_READ has to be 0?

From: David Howells
Date: Mon Jan 16 2023 - 11:30:45 EST

Next message: bhupesh . sharma: "Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: qcom: geni-se: Fix '#address-cells' & '#size-cells' related dt-binding error"
Previous message: Fabrizio Castro: "RE: [PATCH 2/2] watchdog: rzg2l_wdt: Handle TYPE-B reset for RZ/V2M"
In reply to: Jens Axboe: "Re: Is there a reason why REQ_OP_READ has to be 0?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Aha!

The problem is that whilst aio, io_uring and cachefiles set IOCB_WRITE when
giving a write op to the VFS, the write() syscall does not...

David

Next message: bhupesh . sharma: "Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: qcom: geni-se: Fix '#address-cells' & '#size-cells' related dt-binding error"
Previous message: Fabrizio Castro: "RE: [PATCH 2/2] watchdog: rzg2l_wdt: Handle TYPE-B reset for RZ/V2M"
In reply to: Jens Axboe: "Re: Is there a reason why REQ_OP_READ has to be 0?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]