Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/msm/dsi: Add phy configuration for SM6375

From: Konrad Dybcio
Date: Mon Jan 16 2023 - 06:49:47 EST




On 16.01.2023 12:47, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 at 13:42, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 16.01.2023 12:40, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> SM6375 uses a boring standard 7nm PHY. Add a configuration entry for it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Sorry, bit messy revisiting old patches before the email change..
>>
>> Konrad
>>> Depends on [1] to work properly, but won't hurt for it to land
>>> separately..
>>>
>>> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/patch/1642586079-12472-1-git-send-email-loic.poulain@xxxxxxxxxx/
>>>
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.c | 2 ++
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.h | 1 +
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_7nm.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.c
>>> index cbe669fca26d..57445a5dc816 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.c
>>> @@ -569,6 +569,8 @@ static const struct of_device_id dsi_phy_dt_match[] = {
>>> .data = &dsi_phy_7nm_8150_cfgs },
>>> { .compatible = "qcom,sc7280-dsi-phy-7nm",
>>> .data = &dsi_phy_7nm_7280_cfgs },
>>> + { .compatible = "qcom,sm6375-dsi-phy-7nm",
>>> + .data = &dsi_phy_7nm_6375_cfgs },
>>> { .compatible = "qcom,sm8350-dsi-phy-5nm",
>>> .data = &dsi_phy_5nm_8350_cfgs },
>>> { .compatible = "qcom,sm8450-dsi-phy-5nm",
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.h
>>> index 5f0b1c9b09ef..c849bfd7494e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.h
>>> @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ extern const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_14nm_8953_cfgs;
>>> extern const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_10nm_cfgs;
>>> extern const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_10nm_8998_cfgs;
>>> extern const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_7nm_cfgs;
>>> +extern const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_7nm_6375_cfgs;
>>> extern const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_7nm_8150_cfgs;
>>> extern const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_7nm_7280_cfgs;
>>> extern const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_5nm_8350_cfgs;
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_7nm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_7nm.c
>>> index af5c952c6ad0..3b1ed02f644d 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_7nm.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_7nm.c
>>> @@ -1152,6 +1152,26 @@ const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_7nm_cfgs = {
>>> .quirks = DSI_PHY_7NM_QUIRK_V4_1,
>>> };
>>>
>>> +const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_7nm_6375_cfgs = {
>>> + .has_phy_lane = true,
>
> Any regulators here?
Nope, looks like 7nm also deserves a "don't require vdds-supply"
patch, gonna send it right away..

Konrad
>
>>> + .ops = {
>>> + .enable = dsi_7nm_phy_enable,
>>> + .disable = dsi_7nm_phy_disable,
>>> + .pll_init = dsi_pll_7nm_init,
>>> + .save_pll_state = dsi_7nm_pll_save_state,
>>> + .restore_pll_state = dsi_7nm_pll_restore_state,
>>> + },
>>> + .min_pll_rate = 600000000UL,
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
>>> + .max_pll_rate = 5000000000ULL,
>>> +#else
>>> + .max_pll_rate = ULONG_MAX,
>>> +#endif
>>> + .io_start = { 0x5e94400 },
>>> + .num_dsi_phy = 1,
>>> + .quirks = DSI_PHY_7NM_QUIRK_V4_1,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_7nm_8150_cfgs = {
>>> .has_phy_lane = true,
>>> .regulator_data = dsi_phy_7nm_36mA_regulators,
>
>
>