Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: rzn1-a5psw: Add vlan support

From: Clément Léger
Date: Mon Jan 16 2023 - 03:46:01 EST


Le Fri, 13 Jan 2023 14:40:26 +0000,
<Arun.Ramadoss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

> Hi Clement,
> On Wed, 2023-01-11 at 12:56 +0100, Clément Léger wrote:
> > Add support for vlan operation (add, del, filtering) on the RZN1
> > driver. The a5psw switch supports up to 32 VLAN IDs with filtering,
> > tagged/untagged VLANs and PVID for each ports.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <clement.leger@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/dsa/rzn1_a5psw.c | 182
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/net/dsa/rzn1_a5psw.h | 10 +-
> > 2 files changed, 189 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/rzn1_a5psw.c
> > b/drivers/net/dsa/rzn1_a5psw.c
> > index ed413d555bec..8ecb9214b5e6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/dsa/rzn1_a5psw.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/rzn1_a5psw.c
> > @@ -540,6 +540,161 @@ static int a5psw_port_fdb_dump(struct
> > dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > +static int a5psw_port_vlan_filtering(struct dsa_switch *ds, int
> > port,
> > + bool vlan_filtering,
> > + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> > +{
> > + u32 mask = BIT(port + A5PSW_VLAN_VERI_SHIFT)
> > + | BIT(port + A5PSW_VLAN_DISC_SHIFT);
>
> Operator | at the end of line
>
> > + struct a5psw *a5psw = ds->priv;
> > + u32 val = 0;
> > +
> > + if (vlan_filtering)
> > + val = BIT(port + A5PSW_VLAN_VERI_SHIFT)
> > + | BIT(port + A5PSW_VLAN_DISC_SHIFT);
>
> Operator | at the end of line

Hi Arun,

I'll fix that.

>
> > +
> > + a5psw_reg_rmw(a5psw, A5PSW_VLAN_VERIFY, mask, val);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int a5psw_port_vlan_add(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> > + const struct switchdev_obj_port_vlan
> > *vlan,
> > + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> > +{
> > + bool tagged = !(vlan->flags & BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO_UNTAGGED);
> > + bool pvid = vlan->flags & BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO_PVID;
> > + struct a5psw *a5psw = ds->priv;
> > + u16 vid = vlan->vid;
> > + int ret = -EINVAL;
> > + int vlan_res_id;
> > +
> > + dev_dbg(a5psw->dev, "Add VLAN %d on port %d, %s, %s\n",
> > + vid, port, tagged ? "tagged" : "untagged",
> > + pvid ? "PVID" : "no PVID");
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&a5psw->vlan_lock);
> > +
> > + vlan_res_id = a5psw_find_vlan_entry(a5psw, vid);
> > + if (vlan_res_id < 0) {
> > + vlan_res_id = a5psw_get_vlan_res_entry(a5psw, vid);
> > + if (vlan_res_id < 0)
>
> nit: We can initialize ret = 0 initially, and assign ret = -EINVAL here
> & remove ret = 0 at end of function.
>
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > +
> > + a5psw_port_vlan_cfg(a5psw, vlan_res_id, port, true);
> > + if (tagged)
> > + a5psw_port_vlan_tagged_cfg(a5psw, vlan_res_id, port,
> > true);
> > +
> > + if (pvid) {
> > + a5psw_reg_rmw(a5psw, A5PSW_VLAN_IN_MODE_ENA, BIT(port),
> > + BIT(port));
> > + a5psw_reg_writel(a5psw, A5PSW_SYSTEM_TAGINFO(port),
> > vid);
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = 0;
> > +out:
> > + mutex_unlock(&a5psw->vlan_lock);
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int a5psw_port_vlan_del(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> > + const struct switchdev_obj_port_vlan
> > *vlan)
> > +{
> > + struct a5psw *a5psw = ds->priv;
> > + u16 vid = vlan->vid;
> > + int ret = -EINVAL;
>
> Simillarly here.

Since I removed the mutex thanks to the previous comments, I have
removed all the "ret" usage.

Thanks,

--
Clément Léger,
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineer at Bootlin
https://bootlin.com