Re: [PATCH] tools/iio/iio_utils:fix memory leak

From: Jonathan Cameron
Date: Sat Jan 14 2023 - 11:27:47 EST


On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 19:01:22 +0800
Yulong Zhang <yulong.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 1.fopen sysfsfp without fclose
> 2.asprintf filename without free
>
> Signed-off-by: Yulong Zhang <yulong.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Good spot. One suggestion below on how to tidy up the code
whilst fixing this.

> ---
> tools/iio/iio_utils.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/iio/iio_utils.c b/tools/iio/iio_utils.c
> index 8d35893b2..38e9352e5 100644
> --- a/tools/iio/iio_utils.c
> +++ b/tools/iio/iio_utils.c
> @@ -264,6 +264,8 @@ int iioutils_get_param_float(float *output, const char *param_name,
> if (fscanf(sysfsfp, "%f", output) != 1)
> ret = errno ? -errno : -ENODATA;
>
> + fclose(sysfsfp);
> +
> break;
> }
> error_free_filename:
> @@ -444,6 +446,7 @@ int build_channel_array(const char *device_dir, int buffer_idx,
> count--;
> goto error_cleanup_array;
> }
> + free(filename);

Instead of doing it here, why not move the free as early as possible (and hence
drop the need to do it in most of the error paths.
sysfsfp = fopen(filename, "r");
+ free(filename);
if (!sysfsfp) {
ret = -errno;
- free(filename)
... and the other cases that follow.

The same could be done for the case below, at the minor cost of not
having the filename for the print statement (which I think would be fine).

>
> ret = asprintf(&filename,
> "%s/%s_index",