Re: [PATCH v6 09/13] HID: i2c-hid: acpi: Stop setting wakeup_capable

From: Limonciello, Mario
Date: Thu Jan 12 2023 - 15:41:20 EST


On 1/12/2023 13:57, Werner Sembach wrote:
Hi,

Am 29.09.22 um 18:19 schrieb Raul E Rangel:
This is now handled by the i2c-core drive >
Signed-off-by: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@xxxxxxxxxx>
---

(no changes since v5)

Changes in v5:
- Added Acked-by: Benjamin Tissoires

  drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-acpi.c | 5 -----
  1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-acpi.c b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-acpi.c
index b96ae15e0ad917e..375c77c3db74d92 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-acpi.c
@@ -105,11 +105,6 @@ static int i2c_hid_acpi_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
      acpi_device_fix_up_power(adev);
-    if (acpi_gbl_FADT.flags & ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0) {
-        device_set_wakeup_capable(dev, true);
-        device_set_wakeup_enable(dev, false);
-    }
-
      return i2c_hid_core_probe(client, &ihid_acpi->ops,
                    hid_descriptor_address, 0);
  }

this patch is causing a regression on the Clevo NL50RU of which the touchpad instantly wakes up the device when going to sleep. That wasn't triggered until this patch by the default settings: Setting wake capable but not enabling it by default. So unless a user enabled it by hand, the device went correctly to sleep.

I'm not deep into this subsystem so I don't know what the best approach is to ?work around this firmware bug?/?fix this issue?:
- Changing the default back again?
- Adding a quirk list for bad devices?
- Maybe this isn't a firmware bug, but the touchpad was not meant to wakeup the device and we can somehow detect that?


"Generally" laptops that support modern standby/s2idle can be woken from the touchpad.

By chance can you check Windows? Wait a few minutes after you put it to
sleep to ensure it's really gotten down to a hardware sleep state.

For reference: The debugging issue that lead me here: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1722#note_1719789

TLDR - That bug has multiple conflated issues, and you can ignore 95% of it. It's just the last few comments we concluded and bisected down this regression.