[PATCHv2 1/7] x86/tdx: Fix typo in comment in __tdx_hypercall()

[Kirill A. Shutemov]

Comment in __tdx_hypercall() points that RAX==0 indicates TDVMCALL
failure which is opposite of the truth: RAX==0 is success.

Fix the comment. No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdcall.S | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdcall.S b/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdcall.S
index f9eb1134f22d..74b108e94a0d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdcall.S
+++ b/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdcall.S
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__tdx_hypercall)
 	tdcall
 
 	/*
-	 * RAX==0 indicates a failure of the TDVMCALL mechanism itself and that
+	 * RAX!=0 indicates a failure of the TDVMCALL mechanism itself and that
 	 * something has gone horribly wrong with the TDX module.
 	 *
 	 * The return status of the hypercall operation is in a separate
-- 
2.38.2