[PATCH 0/2] kselftest/arm64: Improvements to BTI tests on non-BTI systems

[Mark Brown]

While looking at the BTI selftest results on a non-BTI system I noticed
that not only are we printing invalid test numbers in that case, we're
skipping running the tests entirely even though there's a well defined
ABI we could be verifying and the code already knows what the results
should be.

The first patch here is a fix to the reporting of test numbers when
skipping, the second one just removes the skipping entirely in favour of
a runtime check for what the result of a BTI binary should be.

To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
To: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: Shuah Khan <shuah@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>

---
Mark Brown (2):
      kselftest/arm64: Fix test numbering when skipping tests
      kselftest/arm64: Run BTI selftests on systems without BTI

 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/bti/test.c | 25 ++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: b7bfaa761d760e72a969d116517eaa12e404c262
change-id: 20230110-arm64-bti-selftest-skip-9fdf5e94fb62

Best regards,
-- 
Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>