Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] perf build: Properly guard libbpf includes

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo]

Em Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 12:19:53PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 11:34:44AM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > Oh, just to note. While failing the feature test is disappointing for
> > a libbpf that isn't very old, we have the newer libbpf to statically
> > build in. Developers won't be impacted due to the static route. If you
> > are a distro maintainer, you should just update your libbpf. So we
> > could just bump the API assumption to 1.0 as I believe that'd have the
> > advantage of removing feature tests, workarounds, untested code (like
> > what broke here), etc.

> > What do you think?
 
> yes, seems good.. fedora has libbpf 1.0 already so should not be problem
> there at least ;-)

So, I already pushed 1/2 to perf/urgent, can I stick an Acked-by: jolsa
to the second?

- Arnaldo