Re: [PATCH v1 1/6] i2c: hpe: Add GXP SoC I2C Controller

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Tue Jan 10 2023 - 03:36:10 EST


On 09/01/2023 21:23, Hawkins, Nick wrote:
>>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + if (!drvdata)
>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>> +
>>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, drvdata);
>>> + drvdata->dev = &pdev->dev;
>>> + init_completion(&drvdata->completion);
>>> +
>>> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>>> + drvdata->base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
>
>> It's one call, not two. Use the respective helper.
>
> Greetings Krzysztof,
>
> Thank you for the feedback. I am in the process of applying your recommended
> changes but do have a question on this comment.
>
> I can replace these two lines with:
> drvdata->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
>
> However, I still have a need for the resource "res" here to determine the physical
> address of the device here:
>
>>> + if (IS_ERR(drvdata->base))
>>> + return PTR_ERR(drvdata->base);
>>> +
>>> + drvdata->engine = (res->start & 0xf00) >> 8;
>>> + pr_info("%s: i2c engine%d\n", __func__, drvdata->engine);

Entire pr_info must be gone, so you do not need res anymore. You should
not print any addresses. Unless drvdata->engine is used further?

In such case you have function just few lines above the one you
mentioned, don't you?

>
> Hence at some point I believe I will still need to call the "platform_get_resource"
> function to accomplish this. Is this acceptable or perhaps you have another
> suggestion?
>
> One alternative I thought of was including a property in the device tree node
> That specifies which i2c engine this is: hpe,gxp-engine = <1>.


Best regards,
Krzysztof