Re: [PATCH RFC v7 52/64] KVM: SVM: Provide support for SNP_GUEST_REQUEST NAE event
From: Kalra, Ashish
Date: Tue Jan 10 2023 - 03:33:44 EST
On 1/9/2023 8:28 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 10/1/23 10:41, Kalra, Ashish wrote:
On 1/8/2023 9:33 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 15/12/22 06:40, Michael Roth wrote:
From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
Version 2 of GHCB specification added the support for two SNP Guest
Request Message NAE events. The events allows for an SEV-SNP guest to
make request to the SEV-SNP firmware through hypervisor using the
SNP_GUEST_REQUEST API define in the SEV-SNP firmware specification.
The SNP_EXT_GUEST_REQUEST is similar to SNP_GUEST_REQUEST with the
difference of an additional certificate blob that can be passed through
the SNP_SET_CONFIG ioctl defined in the CCP driver. The CCP driver
provides snp_guest_ext_guest_request() that is used by the KVM to get
both the report and certificate data at once.
Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <michael.roth@xxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c | 185
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h | 2 +
2 files changed, 181 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
index 5f2b2092cdae..18efa70553c2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
@@ -331,6 +331,7 @@ static int sev_guest_init(struct kvm *kvm,
struct kvm_sev_cmd *argp)
if (ret)
goto e_free;
+ mutex_init(&sev->guest_req_lock);
ret = sev_snp_init(&argp->error, false);
} else {
ret = sev_platform_init(&argp->error);
@@ -2051,23 +2052,34 @@ int sev_vm_move_enc_context_from(struct kvm
*kvm, unsigned int source_fd)
*/
static void *snp_context_create(struct kvm *kvm, struct
kvm_sev_cmd *argp)
{
+ struct kvm_sev_info *sev = &to_kvm_svm(kvm)->sev_info;
struct sev_data_snp_addr data = {};
- void *context;
+ void *context, *certs_data;
int rc;
+ /* Allocate memory used for the certs data in SNP guest request */
+ certs_data = kzalloc(SEV_FW_BLOB_MAX_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
+ if (!certs_data)
+ return NULL;
+
/* Allocate memory for context page */
context = snp_alloc_firmware_page(GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
if (!context)
- return NULL;
+ goto e_free;
data.gctx_paddr = __psp_pa(context);
rc = __sev_issue_cmd(argp->sev_fd, SEV_CMD_SNP_GCTX_CREATE,
&data, &argp->error);
- if (rc) {
- snp_free_firmware_page(context);
- return NULL;
- }
+ if (rc)
+ goto e_free;
+
+ sev->snp_certs_data = certs_data;
return context;
+
+e_free:
+ snp_free_firmware_page(context);
+ kfree(certs_data);
+ return NULL;
}
static int snp_bind_asid(struct kvm *kvm, int *error)
@@ -2653,6 +2665,8 @@ static int snp_decommission_context(struct kvm
*kvm)
snp_free_firmware_page(sev->snp_context);
sev->snp_context = NULL;
+ kfree(sev->snp_certs_data);
+
return 0;
}
@@ -3174,6 +3188,8 @@ static int sev_es_validate_vmgexit(struct
vcpu_svm *svm, u64 *exit_code)
case SVM_VMGEXIT_UNSUPPORTED_EVENT:
case SVM_VMGEXIT_HV_FEATURES:
case SVM_VMGEXIT_PSC:
+ case SVM_VMGEXIT_GUEST_REQUEST:
+ case SVM_VMGEXIT_EXT_GUEST_REQUEST:
break;
default:
reason = GHCB_ERR_INVALID_EVENT;
@@ -3396,6 +3412,149 @@ static int snp_complete_psc(struct kvm_vcpu
*vcpu)
return 1;
}
+static unsigned long snp_setup_guest_buf(struct vcpu_svm *svm,
+ struct sev_data_snp_guest_request *data,
+ gpa_t req_gpa, gpa_t resp_gpa)
+{
+ struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = &svm->vcpu;
+ struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
+ kvm_pfn_t req_pfn, resp_pfn;
+ struct kvm_sev_info *sev;
+
+ sev = &to_kvm_svm(kvm)->sev_info;
+
+ if (!IS_ALIGNED(req_gpa, PAGE_SIZE) || !IS_ALIGNED(resp_gpa,
PAGE_SIZE))
+ return SEV_RET_INVALID_PARAM;
+
+ req_pfn = gfn_to_pfn(kvm, gpa_to_gfn(req_gpa));
+ if (is_error_noslot_pfn(req_pfn))
+ return SEV_RET_INVALID_ADDRESS;
+
+ resp_pfn = gfn_to_pfn(kvm, gpa_to_gfn(resp_gpa));
+ if (is_error_noslot_pfn(resp_pfn))
+ return SEV_RET_INVALID_ADDRESS;
+
+ if (rmp_make_private(resp_pfn, 0, PG_LEVEL_4K, 0, true))
+ return SEV_RET_INVALID_ADDRESS;
+
+ data->gctx_paddr = __psp_pa(sev->snp_context);
+ data->req_paddr = __sme_set(req_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
+ data->res_paddr = __sme_set(resp_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void snp_cleanup_guest_buf(struct sev_data_snp_guest_request
*data, unsigned long *rc)
+{
+ u64 pfn = __sme_clr(data->res_paddr) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = snp_page_reclaim(pfn);
+ if (ret)
+ *rc = SEV_RET_INVALID_ADDRESS;
+
+ ret = rmp_make_shared(pfn, PG_LEVEL_4K);
+ if (ret)
+ *rc = SEV_RET_INVALID_ADDRESS;
+}
+
+static void snp_handle_guest_request(struct vcpu_svm *svm, gpa_t
req_gpa, gpa_t resp_gpa)
+{
+ struct sev_data_snp_guest_request data = {0};
+ struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = &svm->vcpu;
+ struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
+ struct kvm_sev_info *sev;
+ unsigned long rc;
+ int err;
+
+ if (!sev_snp_guest(vcpu->kvm)) {
+ rc = SEV_RET_INVALID_GUEST;
+ goto e_fail;
+ }
+
+ sev = &to_kvm_svm(kvm)->sev_info;
+
+ mutex_lock(&sev->guest_req_lock);
+
+ rc = snp_setup_guest_buf(svm, &data, req_gpa, resp_gpa);
+ if (rc)
+ goto unlock;
+
+ rc = sev_issue_cmd(kvm, SEV_CMD_SNP_GUEST_REQUEST, &data, &err);
This one goes via sev_issue_cmd_external_user() and uses sev-fd...
+ if (rc)
+ /* use the firmware error code */
+ rc = err;
+
+ snp_cleanup_guest_buf(&data, &rc);
+
+unlock:
+ mutex_unlock(&sev->guest_req_lock);
+
+e_fail:
+ svm_set_ghcb_sw_exit_info_2(vcpu, rc);
+}
+
+static void snp_handle_ext_guest_request(struct vcpu_svm *svm,
gpa_t req_gpa, gpa_t resp_gpa)
+{
+ struct sev_data_snp_guest_request req = {0};
+ struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = &svm->vcpu;
+ struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
+ unsigned long data_npages;
+ struct kvm_sev_info *sev;
+ unsigned long rc, err;
+ u64 data_gpa;
+
+ if (!sev_snp_guest(vcpu->kvm)) {
+ rc = SEV_RET_INVALID_GUEST;
+ goto e_fail;
+ }
+
+ sev = &to_kvm_svm(kvm)->sev_info;
+
+ data_gpa = vcpu->arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RAX];
+ data_npages = vcpu->arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RBX];
+
+ if (!IS_ALIGNED(data_gpa, PAGE_SIZE)) {
+ rc = SEV_RET_INVALID_ADDRESS;
+ goto e_fail;
+ }
+
+ mutex_lock(&sev->guest_req_lock);
+
+ rc = snp_setup_guest_buf(svm, &req, req_gpa, resp_gpa);
+ if (rc)
+ goto unlock;
+
+ rc = snp_guest_ext_guest_request(&req, (unsigned
long)sev->snp_certs_data,
+ &data_npages, &err);
but this one does not and jump straight to
drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c ignoring sev->fd. Why different? Can
these two be unified? sev_issue_cmd_external_user() only checks if fd
is /dev/sev which is hardly useful.
"[PATCH RFC v7 32/64] crypto: ccp: Provide APIs to query extended
attestation report" added this one.
SNP_EXT_GUEST_REQUEST additionally returns a certificate blob and
that's why it goes through the CCP driver interface
snp_guest_ext_guest_request() that is used to get both the report and
certificate data/blob at the same time.
True. I thought though that this calls for extending sev_issue_cmd() to
take care of these extra parameters rather than just skipping the sev->fd.
All the FW API calls on the KVM side go through sev_issue_cmd() and
sev_issue_cmd_external_user() interfaces and that i believe uses
sev->fd more of as a sanity check.
Does not look like it:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c?h=v6.2-rc3#n1290
===
int sev_issue_cmd_external_user(struct file *filep, unsigned int cmd,
void *data, int *error)
{
if (!filep || filep->f_op != &sev_fops)
return -EBADF;
return sev_do_cmd(cmd, data, error);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sev_issue_cmd_external_user);
===
The only "more" is that it requires sev->fd to be a valid open fd, what
is the value in that? I may easily miss the bigger picture here. Thanks,
Have a look at following functions in drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c:
sev_dev_init() and sev_misc_init().
static int sev_misc_init(struct sev_device *sev)
{
struct device *dev = sev->dev;
int ret;
/*
* SEV feature support can be detected on multiple devices but
* the SEV FW commands must be issued on the master. During
* probe, we do not know the master hence we create /dev/sev on
* the first device probe.
* sev_do_cmd() finds the right master device to which to issue
* the command to the firmware.
*/
...
...
Hence, sev_issue_cmd_external_user() needs to ensure that the correct
device (master device) is being operated upon and that's why there is
the check for file operations matching sev_fops as below :
int sev_issue_cmd_external_user(struct file *filep, unsigned int cmd,
void *data, int *error)
{
if (!filep || filep->f_op != &sev_fops)
return -EBADF;
..
..
Essentially, sev->fd is the misc. device created for the master PSP
device on which the SEV/SNP firmware commands are issued, hence,
sev_issue_cmd() uses sev->fd.
Thanks,
Ashish