Re: [PATCH] bit_spinlock: Include <asm/processor.h>

[Dan Carpenter]

On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 08:04:44PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> In an attempt to simplify some includes in <include/dcache.h>, it
> appeared, when compiling fs/ecryptfs/dentry.c, that <linux/bit_spinlock.h>
> was relying on other includes to get the definition of cpu_relax().
> (see [1])
> 
> It broke on arc.
> 
> Include <asm/processor.h> in <linux/bit_spinlock.h> to fix the issue.
> This will help remove some un-needed includes from <include/dcache.h>.
> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/202301082130.LXMj5qkD-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Not sure who to send this to.
> get_maintainer.pl is of no help, and the file is untouched from a too long
> time.
> 
> Greg? Dan? Any pointer?

Andrew Morton is the maintainer of last resort.  Plus spinlocks seem
like something he would be interested in.  Otherwise Ingo, Peter Z and
the x86 team.

regards,
dan carpenter