Re: [PATCH v2] edac: fix period calculation in edac_device_reset_delay_period()

From: Borislav Petkov
Date: Fri Dec 30 2022 - 09:48:20 EST


On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 10:17:48PM +0200, Farber, Eliav wrote:
> The one-liner below will not work. See the comment in
> edac_device_workq_setup() that explains why round is used:

Bah, right you are - there's that "optimization".

Ok, I've applied this:

---
From: Eliav Farber <farbere@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 12:44:58 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] EDAC/device: Fix period calculation in
edac_device_reset_delay_period()

Fix period calculation in case user sets a value of 1000. The input of
round_jiffies_relative() should be in jiffies and not in milli-seconds.

[ bp: Use the same code pattern as in edac_device_workq_setup() for
clarity. ]

Fixes: c4cf3b454eca ("EDAC: Rework workqueue handling")
Signed-off-by: Eliav Farber <farbere@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221020124458.22153-1-farbere@xxxxxxxxxx
---
drivers/edac/edac_device.c | 17 ++++++++---------
drivers/edac/edac_module.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_device.c b/drivers/edac/edac_device.c
index 19522c568aa5..878deb4880cd 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/edac_device.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/edac_device.c
@@ -394,17 +394,16 @@ static void edac_device_workq_teardown(struct edac_device_ctl_info *edac_dev)
* Then restart the workq on the new delay
*/
void edac_device_reset_delay_period(struct edac_device_ctl_info *edac_dev,
- unsigned long value)
+ unsigned long msec)
{
- unsigned long jiffs = msecs_to_jiffies(value);
-
- if (value == 1000)
- jiffs = round_jiffies_relative(value);
-
- edac_dev->poll_msec = value;
- edac_dev->delay = jiffs;
+ edac_dev->poll_msec = msec;
+ edac_dev->delay = msecs_to_jiffies(msec);

- edac_mod_work(&edac_dev->work, jiffs);
+ /* See comment in edac_device_workq_setup() above */
+ if (edac_dev->poll_msec == 1000)
+ edac_mod_work(&edac_dev->work, round_jiffies_relative(edac_dev->delay));
+ else
+ edac_mod_work(&edac_dev->work, edac_dev->delay);
}

int edac_device_alloc_index(void)
diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_module.h b/drivers/edac/edac_module.h
index 763c076d96f2..47593afdc234 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/edac_module.h
+++ b/drivers/edac/edac_module.h
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ bool edac_stop_work(struct delayed_work *work);
bool edac_mod_work(struct delayed_work *work, unsigned long delay);

extern void edac_device_reset_delay_period(struct edac_device_ctl_info
- *edac_dev, unsigned long value);
+ *edac_dev, unsigned long msec);
extern void edac_mc_reset_delay_period(unsigned long value);

/*
--
2.35.1

Thx.

--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette