RE: [PATCH 4/4] rtw88: Use non-atomic rtw_iterate_stas() in rtw_ra_mask_info_update()

From: Ping-Ke Shih
Date: Thu Dec 29 2022 - 04:42:53 EST




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2022 9:36 PM
> To: linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: tony0620emma@xxxxxxxxx; kvalo@xxxxxxxxxx; Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx>; tehuang@xxxxxxxxxxx;
> s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Martin Blumenstingl
> <martin.blumenstingl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [PATCH 4/4] rtw88: Use non-atomic rtw_iterate_stas() in rtw_ra_mask_info_update()
>
> USB and (upcoming) SDIO support may sleep in the read/write handlers.
> Use non-atomic rtw_iterate_stas() in rtw_ra_mask_info_update() because
> the iterator function rtw_ra_mask_info_update_iter() needs to read and
> write registers from within rtw_update_sta_info(). Using the non-atomic
> iterator ensures that we can sleep during USB and SDIO register reads
> and writes. This fixes "scheduling while atomic" or "Voluntary context
> switch within RCU read-side critical section!" warnings as seen by SDIO
> card users (but it also affects USB cards).
>
> Fixes: 78d5bf925f30 ("wifi: rtw88: iterate over vif/sta list non-atomically")
> Suggested-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/mac80211.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/mac80211.c
> b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/mac80211.c
> index 776a9a9884b5..3b92ac611d3f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/mac80211.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/mac80211.c
> @@ -737,7 +737,7 @@ static void rtw_ra_mask_info_update(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev,
> br_data.rtwdev = rtwdev;
> br_data.vif = vif;
> br_data.mask = mask;
> - rtw_iterate_stas_atomic(rtwdev, rtw_ra_mask_info_update_iter, &br_data);
> + rtw_iterate_stas(rtwdev, rtw_ra_mask_info_update_iter, &br_data);
> }
>
> static int rtw_ops_set_bitrate_mask(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
> @@ -746,7 +746,9 @@ static int rtw_ops_set_bitrate_mask(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
> {
> struct rtw_dev *rtwdev = hw->priv;
>
> + mutex_lock(&rtwdev->mutex);
> rtw_ra_mask_info_update(rtwdev, vif, mask);
> + mutex_unlock(&rtwdev->mutex);
>
> return 0;
> }
> --
> 2.39.0