RE: [PATCH net-next v3] dsa: lan9303: Add 3 ethtool stats

From: Jerry.Ray
Date: Wed Nov 30 2022 - 10:57:51 EST


>> static void lan9303_get_ethtool_stats(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
>> uint64_t *data)
>> {
>> struct lan9303 *chip = ds->priv;
>> - unsigned int u;
>> + unsigned int i, u;
>>
>> for (u = 0; u < ARRAY_SIZE(lan9303_mib); u++) {
>> u32 reg;
>> int ret;
>>
>> - ret = lan9303_read_switch_port(
>> - chip, port, lan9303_mib[u].offset, &reg);
>> -
>> + /* Read Port-based MIB stats. */
>> + ret = lan9303_read_switch_port(chip, port,
>> + lan9303_mib[u].offset,
>> + &reg);
>
>Speaking of unrelated changes...
>

Cleaning up a warning generated from checkpatch

>> if (ret)
>> dev_warn(chip->dev, "Reading status port %d reg %u failed\n",
>> port, lan9303_mib[u].offset);
>
>...If lan9303_read_switch_port() fails, should we copy kernel stack
>uninitialized memory (reg) to user space?
>

Good catch. I'll zero out the returned stat.

>> data[u] = reg;
>> }
>> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(lan9303_switch_mib); i++) {
>> + u32 reg;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + /* Read Switch stats indexed by port. */
>> + ret = lan9303_read_switch_reg(chip,
>> + (lan9303_switch_mib[i].offset +
>> + port), &reg);
>> + if (ret)
>> + dev_warn(chip->dev, "Reading status port %d reg %u failed\n",
>> + port, lan9303_switch_mib[i].offset);
>
>Because the same, existing pattern is also used for new code here.
>

Ditto

>> + data[i + u] = reg;
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> static int lan9303_get_sset_count(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, int sset)
>> @@ -1017,7 +1061,7 @@ static int lan9303_get_sset_count(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, int sset)
>> if (sset != ETH_SS_STATS)
>> return 0;
>>
>> - return ARRAY_SIZE(lan9303_mib);
>> + return ARRAY_SIZE(lan9303_mib) + ARRAY_SIZE(lan9303_switch_mib);
>> }
>>
>> static int lan9303_phy_read(struct dsa_switch *ds, int phy, int regnum)
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
>