Re: [PATCH v2] mmc:mmc-hsq:use fifo to dispatch mmc_request

From: Ulf Hansson
Date: Tue Nov 29 2022 - 07:56:02 EST


On Mon, 28 Nov 2022 at 10:38, Michael Wu <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Current next_tag selection will cause a large delay in some requests and
> destroy the scheduling results of the block scheduling layer. Because the
> issued mrq tags cannot ensure that each time is sequential, especially when
> the IO load is heavy. In the fio performance test, we found that 4k random
> read data was sent to mmc_hsq to start calling request_atomic It takes
> nearly 200ms to process the request, while mmc_hsq has processed thousands
> of other requests. So we use fifo here to ensure the first in, first out
> feature of the request and avoid adding additional delay to the request.
>
> Reviewed-by: Wenchao Chen <wenchao.chen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Wu <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Applied for next, thanks!

Kind regards
Uffe


> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/mmc_hsq.c | 40 ++++++++++++++------------------------
> drivers/mmc/host/mmc_hsq.h | 5 +++++
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mmc_hsq.c b/drivers/mmc/host/mmc_hsq.c
> index 9d35453e7371..424dc7b07858 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/mmc_hsq.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mmc_hsq.c
> @@ -13,9 +13,6 @@
>
> #include "mmc_hsq.h"
>
> -#define HSQ_NUM_SLOTS 64
> -#define HSQ_INVALID_TAG HSQ_NUM_SLOTS
> -
> static void mmc_hsq_retry_handler(struct work_struct *work)
> {
> struct mmc_hsq *hsq = container_of(work, struct mmc_hsq, retry_work);
> @@ -73,7 +70,6 @@ static void mmc_hsq_pump_requests(struct mmc_hsq *hsq)
>
> static void mmc_hsq_update_next_tag(struct mmc_hsq *hsq, int remains)
> {
> - struct hsq_slot *slot;
> int tag;
>
> /*
> @@ -82,29 +78,12 @@ static void mmc_hsq_update_next_tag(struct mmc_hsq *hsq, int remains)
> */
> if (!remains) {
> hsq->next_tag = HSQ_INVALID_TAG;
> + hsq->tail_tag = HSQ_INVALID_TAG;
> return;
> }
>
> - /*
> - * Increasing the next tag and check if the corresponding request is
> - * available, if yes, then we found a candidate request.
> - */
> - if (++hsq->next_tag != HSQ_INVALID_TAG) {
> - slot = &hsq->slot[hsq->next_tag];
> - if (slot->mrq)
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - /* Othersie we should iterate all slots to find a available tag. */
> - for (tag = 0; tag < HSQ_NUM_SLOTS; tag++) {
> - slot = &hsq->slot[tag];
> - if (slot->mrq)
> - break;
> - }
> -
> - if (tag == HSQ_NUM_SLOTS)
> - tag = HSQ_INVALID_TAG;
> -
> + tag = hsq->tag_slot[hsq->next_tag];
> + hsq->tag_slot[hsq->next_tag] = HSQ_INVALID_TAG;
> hsq->next_tag = tag;
> }
>
> @@ -233,8 +212,14 @@ static int mmc_hsq_request(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_request *mrq)
> * Set the next tag as current request tag if no available
> * next tag.
> */
> - if (hsq->next_tag == HSQ_INVALID_TAG)
> + if (hsq->next_tag == HSQ_INVALID_TAG) {
> hsq->next_tag = tag;
> + hsq->tail_tag = tag;
> + hsq->tag_slot[hsq->tail_tag] = HSQ_INVALID_TAG;
> + } else {
> + hsq->tag_slot[hsq->tail_tag] = tag;
> + hsq->tail_tag = tag;
> + }
>
> hsq->qcnt++;
>
> @@ -339,8 +324,10 @@ static const struct mmc_cqe_ops mmc_hsq_ops = {
>
> int mmc_hsq_init(struct mmc_hsq *hsq, struct mmc_host *mmc)
> {
> + int i;
> hsq->num_slots = HSQ_NUM_SLOTS;
> hsq->next_tag = HSQ_INVALID_TAG;
> + hsq->tail_tag = HSQ_INVALID_TAG;
>
> hsq->slot = devm_kcalloc(mmc_dev(mmc), hsq->num_slots,
> sizeof(struct hsq_slot), GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -351,6 +338,9 @@ int mmc_hsq_init(struct mmc_hsq *hsq, struct mmc_host *mmc)
> hsq->mmc->cqe_private = hsq;
> mmc->cqe_ops = &mmc_hsq_ops;
>
> + for (i = 0; i < HSQ_NUM_SLOTS; i++)
> + hsq->tag_slot[i] = HSQ_INVALID_TAG;
> +
> INIT_WORK(&hsq->retry_work, mmc_hsq_retry_handler);
> spin_lock_init(&hsq->lock);
> init_waitqueue_head(&hsq->wait_queue);
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mmc_hsq.h b/drivers/mmc/host/mmc_hsq.h
> index ffdd9cd172c3..1808024fc6c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/mmc_hsq.h
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mmc_hsq.h
> @@ -2,6 +2,9 @@
> #ifndef LINUX_MMC_HSQ_H
> #define LINUX_MMC_HSQ_H
>
> +#define HSQ_NUM_SLOTS 64
> +#define HSQ_INVALID_TAG HSQ_NUM_SLOTS
> +
> struct hsq_slot {
> struct mmc_request *mrq;
> };
> @@ -17,6 +20,8 @@ struct mmc_hsq {
> int next_tag;
> int num_slots;
> int qcnt;
> + int tail_tag;
> + int tag_slot[HSQ_NUM_SLOTS];
>
> bool enabled;
> bool waiting_for_idle;
> --
> 2.29.0
>